A comparison of student clerkship experiences in community practices and residency-based clinics.

BACKGROUND

In our required family medicine clerkship, we used data from student logbook records of clinical experience to compare the learning experiences of students in community practices and residency-based clinics.

METHODS

Sixty-eight University of Washington students collected data on patients seen during the final two weeks of their family medicine clerkships. We compared patient demographics, location of patient encounters, and clinical problems seen at nine residency and eight community locations in a four-state area. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data were used to compare student experiences to national practices.

RESULTS

Log data documented that both community practices and residency sites met the course curriculum goals. Some variations occurred between the two types of clerkship sites, however. Students at community practices saw a higher mean number of patients and did more procedures than students at residency sites. Students at residencies were more likely to see patients for health maintenance and pregnancy care and less likely to see lacerations, sprains or strains, and some chronic diseases.

CONCLUSION

Episodic log data were successfully used to monitor the objective educational strategies for residency- and community-based student clerkship sites. Although all students met clerkship objectives, there were significant differences in certain aspects of students' clinical experiences at the two types of clerkship sites.