Dudar J C, Pfeiffer S, Saunders S R
School of Human Biology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
J Forensic Sci. 1993 May;38(3):677-85.
Adult age-at-death estimation standards were applied to an independent sample (N = 50, 55) of documented ages 17.5 to 95 years. Estimates derived from the sternal rib end morphological and from the cortical rib histological techniques were compared with each other and to the documented ages. Comparisons to the documented ages reveal no statistically significant differences between the techniques. However, the comparison of each individual's estimates show a poor correlation (r = 0.54) despite the equal performance of the age estimations on the entire sample. Averaging of the two rib age estimates results in an estimate with a stronger Pearson's r (0.86) and a lower standard error of the estimate (7.5 years).
将成人死亡年龄估计标准应用于一个独立样本(N = 50, 55),这些样本记录的年龄在17.5岁至95岁之间。将从胸骨肋骨末端形态学和皮质肋骨组织学技术得出的估计值相互比较,并与记录的年龄进行比较。与记录年龄的比较显示,这些技术之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,尽管在整个样本中年龄估计的表现相同,但对每个个体估计值的比较显示相关性较差(r = 0.54)。对两个肋骨年龄估计值进行平均,得到的估计值具有更强的皮尔逊r值(0.86)和更低的估计标准误差(7.5岁)。