• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[小剂量氟哌利多的术后止吐作用]

[Postoperative anti-emetic effects of low dose droperidol].

作者信息

Fujii Y, Tanaka H

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Toride Kyodo General Hospital.

出版信息

Masui. 1993 May;42(5):694-7.

PMID:8515545
Abstract

We studied the postoperative anti-emetic effects of low dose droperidol which was compared with that of metoclopramide in 60 gynecological patients. The effects at the third and 24th hours after surgery were evaluated by means of the nausea and vomiting score; 0 = none, 1 = discomfort, 2 = nausea, 3 = vomiting. The sores of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 3 hours after operation showed no significant difference between droperidol and metoclopramide groups (D: 0.2 +/- 0.4, M: 0.3 +/- 0.6). However, there was a significant difference between the two groups after 24 hours (D: 0.2 +/- 0.5, M: 0.8 +/- 1.0). We conclude that droperidol has a potent antiemetic effect that lasts after 24 hours.

摘要

我们研究了低剂量氟哌利多的术后止吐效果,并将其与甲氧氯普胺在60例妇科患者中的效果进行比较。通过恶心和呕吐评分评估术后第3小时和第24小时的效果;0 = 无,1 = 不适,2 = 恶心,3 = 呕吐。术后3小时内,氟哌利多组和甲氧氯普胺组术后恶心和呕吐评分无显著差异(氟哌利多组:0.2±0.4,甲氧氯普胺组:0.3±0.6)。然而,24小时后两组之间存在显著差异(氟哌利多组:0.2±0.5,甲氧氯普胺组:0.8±1.0)。我们得出结论,氟哌利多具有强效止吐作用,且在24小时后仍持续存在。

相似文献

1
[Postoperative anti-emetic effects of low dose droperidol].[小剂量氟哌利多的术后止吐作用]
Masui. 1993 May;42(5):694-7.
2
Nausea and vomiting after termination of pregnancy as day surgery cases: comparison of 3 different doses of droperidol and metoclopramide as anti-emetic prophylaxis.日间手术病例中终止妊娠后的恶心和呕吐:三种不同剂量氟哌利多与甲氧氯普胺作为预防呕吐药物的比较
Singapore Med J. 1991 Oct;32(5):342-3.
3
[Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecologic surgery with 3 fixed doses of metoclopramide, droperidol or placebo].[使用三种固定剂量的甲氧氯普胺、氟哌利多或安慰剂预防妇科手术术后恶心和呕吐]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2001 Feb;48(2):65-8.
4
A randomized comparison of droperidol, metoclopramide, tropisetron, and ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.一项多拉司琼、甲氧氯普胺、托烷司琼和昂丹司琼预防术后恶心呕吐的随机比较。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(1):59-65. doi: 10.1159/000320747. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
5
A placebo-controlled, randomized trial of droperidol versus metoclopramide for outpatients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy under conscious sedation.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Apr;85(4):470-6.
6
[The efficacy of droperidol, metoclopramide, propofol, and ondansetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting following middle ear surgery].[氟哌利多、甲氧氯普胺、丙泊酚和昂丹司琼预防中耳手术后恶心呕吐的疗效]
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2002 Sep-Oct;9(5):331-6.
7
Droperidol, alizapride and metoclopramide in the prevention and treatment of post-operative emetic sequelae.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1986 Jan;3(1):1-9.
8
[Prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after thyroid surgery: comparison of oral and intravenous dolasetron with intravenous droperidol and placebo].[甲状腺手术后恶心呕吐的预防:口服和静脉注射多潘立酮与静脉注射氟哌利多及安慰剂的比较]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2001 Jul;36(7):425-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15436.
9
A comparison of antiemetic efficacy of droperidol alone and in combination with metoclopramide in day surgery anaesthesia.氟哌利多单独及与胃复安联合用于日间手术麻醉时的止吐效果比较。
Med J Malaysia. 1997 Sep;52(3):264-8.
10
[Comparison of methylprednisolone and droperidol in the prevention of nausea and vomiting following major gynaecological surgery].甲泼尼龙与氟哌利多预防妇科大手术后恶心呕吐的比较
Masui. 1991 Nov;40(11):1603-7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative phase: relative effectiveness of droperidol and metoclopramide].[术后恶心呕吐的预防:氟哌利多与甲氧氯普胺的相对疗效]
Anaesthesist. 2011 May;60(5):432-40, 442-5. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1825-4. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
2
Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting with granisetron.
Can J Anaesth. 1994 Apr;41(4):291-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03009906.