• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输卵管绝育术对月经指标及盆腔疼痛的长期影响。

Long-term effect of tubal sterilization on menstrual indices and pelvic pain.

作者信息

Rulin M C, Davidson A R, Philliber S G, Graves W L, Cushman L F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):118-21.

PMID:8515910
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effect of tubal sterilization on menstrual indices and pelvic pain.

METHODS

Five hundred women undergoing sterilization were interviewed before sterilization, 6-10 months after surgery, and 3-4.5 years later. Four hundred sixty-six non-sterilized comparison women were interviewed in parallel. The study population consisted of low-income, ethnically and regionally diverse women from three participating institutions.

RESULTS

When women who were taking oral contraceptives were excluded, no long-term differences was found between sterilized and nonsterilized women in terms of menstrual cycles, bleeding between periods, prolonged or heavy flow, dysmenorrhea, or noncyclic pelvic pain. Hysterectomy was uncommon (3.2%), but statistically more prevalent among sterilized women (4.55%) than nonsterilized women (2.17%) (P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

Tubal sterilization has no long-term effect on menstrual indices or pelvic pain. An increase in severe dysmenorrhea, which emerged as a disturbing but nonsignificant trend at 6-10 months, did not progress over the next 3-4.5 years. Reasons for an increased rate of hysterectomy are not clear, but may be related to a lower threshold for choosing hysterectomy as a treatment option once a woman has been sterilized.

摘要

目的

评估输卵管绝育术对月经指标和盆腔疼痛的长期影响。

方法

对500名接受绝育术的女性在绝育术前、术后6 - 10个月以及3 - 4.5年后进行访谈。同时对466名未绝育的对照女性进行平行访谈。研究人群包括来自三个参与机构的低收入、种族和地区多样化的女性。

结果

排除正在服用口服避孕药的女性后,绝育女性和未绝育女性在月经周期、经期之间出血、经期延长或经量过多、痛经或非周期性盆腔疼痛方面未发现长期差异。子宫切除术不常见(3.2%),但在统计学上,绝育女性(4.55%)比未绝育女性(2.17%)更普遍(P = 0.019)。

结论

输卵管绝育术对月经指标或盆腔疼痛没有长期影响。严重痛经有所增加,在6 - 10个月时出现了令人不安但不显著的趋势,在接下来的3 - 4.5年中并未进一步发展。子宫切除术发生率增加的原因尚不清楚,但可能与女性绝育后选择子宫切除术作为治疗选择的阈值较低有关。

相似文献

1
Long-term effect of tubal sterilization on menstrual indices and pelvic pain.输卵管绝育术对月经指标及盆腔疼痛的长期影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):118-21.
2
Changes in menstrual symptoms among sterilized and comparison women: a prospective study.绝育女性和对照女性月经症状的变化:一项前瞻性研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Aug;74(2):149-54.
3
Late sequelae following laparoscopic sterilization employing electrocoagulation and tubal ring techniques: a comparative study.采用电凝和输卵管环技术的腹腔镜绝育术后远期后遗症:一项对比研究。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1986;75(5):285-9.
4
[Sequelae of tubal ligation].[输卵管结扎的后遗症]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1985 Feb;53(334):35-7.
5
Menstrual changes after tubal sterilization.输卵管绝育术后的月经变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Dec;62(6):673-81.
6
Clinical and pathologic characteristics of women undergoing hysterectomy after tubal sterilization.输卵管绝育术后接受子宫切除术的女性的临床和病理特征。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;88(2):246-50. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00149-4.
7
The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.输卵管绝育术后月经异常的风险。美国绝育协作审查工作组。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 7;343(23):1681-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012073432303.
8
Menstrual function after tubal sterilization.输卵管绝育术后的月经功能。
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Jun 15;135(12):1368-81. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116248.
9
Menstrual pattern changes in laparoscopic sterilization patients whose last pregnancy was terminated by therapeutic abortion. A two-year follow-up study.末次妊娠因治疗性流产而终止的腹腔镜绝育术患者的月经模式变化。一项为期两年的随访研究。
J Reprod Med. 1980 Aug;25(2):67-71.
10
Long-term risk of hysterectomy among 80,007 sterilized and comparison women at Kaiser Permanente, 1971-1987.1971年至1987年期间,凯撒医疗机构80,007名绝育女性及对照女性子宫切除的长期风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct 1;138(7):508-21. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116885.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and conditions associated with chronic pelvic pain in women from São Luís, Brazil.巴西圣路易斯女性慢性盆腔疼痛的患病率及相关情况
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014 Sep;47(9):818-25. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20143710. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
2
WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity.世界卫生组织对慢性盆腔疼痛患病率的系统评价:一种被忽视的生殖健康疾病。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 6;6:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177.