McGuinness N J, Stephens C D
Department of Child Dental Health, University of Bristol Dental School.
Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):123-9. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.123.
A selection of 30 sets of study models, representing a wide range of malocclusions, was drawn from the records of a clinical orthodontic department. Four holograms were made of each set of models; the study models and their corresponding holograms were then scored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index of malocclusion. Significantly lower scores (P < 0.01) were obtained from the holograms, which were ascribed to three out of the seven components which make up the index.
从一个临床正畸科室的记录中选取了30套研究模型，这些模型代表了广泛的错颌畸形类型。每套模型制作了四张全息图；然后使用错颌畸形的同伴评估评分（PAR）指数对研究模型及其相应的全息图进行评分。全息图的得分显著更低（P < 0.01），这归因于构成该指数的七个组成部分中的三个。
