• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌:预后与淋巴结反应性

Gastric cancer: prognosis and lymph node reactivity.

作者信息

Di Giorgio A, Botti C, Mingazzini P, Canavese A, Arnone P

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Surgery, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1995 Aug;161(8):575-80.

PMID:8519873
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of various immunomorphological variables in the prognosis of gastric cancer after curative resection.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University hospital, Italy.

SUBJECTS

180 Patients who underwent curative resection for carcinoma of the distal two thirds of stomach between January 1960 and December 1978. Curative was defined as no residual cancer at the resection margins and no distant metastases.

INTERVENTIONS

All living patients were followed-up, and missing survival data were obtained from the Official Census Registry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlation between survival and nuclear grade, lymphocytic infiltration, and types of lymph node reaction such as sinus histiocytosis, paracortical lymphoid cellular hyperplasia, and follicular hyperplasia in the cortical area.

RESULTS

Crude 5 year and 10 year survival rates were 46% and 36%, respectively. Sex, site, and histological type of the tumour did not correlate with survival. Multivariate analysis showed that only pTNM stage of disease and degree of sinus histiocytosis were significantly related to survival.

CONCLUSION

There may be an argument for using the presence or absence of sinus histiocytosis to stratify patients in prospective studies of adjuvant treatment.

摘要

目的

评估各种免疫形态学变量在胃癌根治性切除术后预后中的价值。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

意大利大学医院。

研究对象

1960年1月至1978年12月期间因胃远端三分之二癌接受根治性切除的180例患者。根治定义为切除边缘无残留癌且无远处转移。

干预措施

对所有在世患者进行随访,并从官方人口普查登记处获取缺失的生存数据。

主要观察指标

生存与核分级、淋巴细胞浸润以及皮质区淋巴结反应类型(如窦组织细胞增生、副皮质区淋巴细胞增生和滤泡增生)之间的相关性。

结果

5年和10年的粗生存率分别为46%和36%。肿瘤的性别、部位和组织学类型与生存无相关性。多变量分析显示,只有疾病的pTNM分期和窦组织细胞增生程度与生存显著相关。

结论

在辅助治疗的前瞻性研究中,可能有理由根据窦组织细胞增生的有无对患者进行分层。

相似文献

1
Gastric cancer: prognosis and lymph node reactivity.胃癌:预后与淋巴结反应性
Eur J Surg. 1995 Aug;161(8):575-80.
2
[Immunomorphology of lymph nodes and prognosis in lung cancer].[肺癌中淋巴结的免疫形态学与预后]
Minerva Chir. 2001 Apr;56(2):153-9.
3
Gastric carcinoma: does lymph node dissection alter survival?胃癌:淋巴结清扫术会改变生存率吗?
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Dec;183(6):616-24.
4
Prognostic significance of level and number of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者淋巴结转移水平和数量的预后意义
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 May;14(5):1688-93. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9314-3. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
5
[Disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma].[晚期胃癌淋巴结转移规律及主动脉旁淋巴结清扫对临床结局的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;9(1):17-22.
6
Does extended lymphadenectomy influence prognosis of gastric carcinoma after curative resection?扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃癌根治性切除术后的预后有影响吗?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Sep-Oct;47(35):1470-4.
7
Lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: influence on prognosis of lymph node count.胃癌淋巴结清扫术:对淋巴结计数预后的影响。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jun;23(2):215-24.
8
Clinicopathologic prognostic factors in patients with Borrmann type 4 gastric cancer: univariate and multivariate analyses.Borrmann 4型胃癌患者的临床病理预后因素:单因素和多因素分析
Ups J Med Sci. 2000;105(3):227-34.
9
Adenocarcinoma in the middle third of the stomach--an evaluation for the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features.胃中三分之一腺癌——临床病理特征预后意义的评估
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Sep-Oct;44(17):1488-94.
10
Proposal to subclassify stage IV gastric cancer into IVA, IVB, and IVM.将IV期胃癌进一步细分为IVA、IVB和IVM期的提议。
Arch Surg. 2009 Jan;144(1):38-45; discussion 45. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.502.