Bajzer Z, Zelić A, Prendergast F G
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Biophys J. 1995 Sep;69(3):1148-61. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79989-1.
Considerable effort in instrument development has made possible detection of picosecond fluorescence lifetimes by time-correlated single-photon counting. In particular, efforts have been made to narrow markedly the instrument response function (IRF). Less attention has been paid to analytical methods, especially to problem of discretization of the convolution integral, on which the detection and quantification of short lifetimes critically depends. We show that better discretization methods can yield acceptable results for short lifetimes even with an IRF several times wider than necessary for the standard discretization based on linear approximation (LA). A general approach to discretization, also suitable for nonexponential models, is developed. The zero-time shift is explicitly included. Using simulations, we compared LA, quadratic, and cubic approximations. The latter two proved much better for detection of short lifetimes and, in that respect, they do not differ except when the zero-time shift exceeds two channels, when one can benefit from using the cubic approximation. We showed that for LA in some cases narrowing the IRF beyond FWHM = 150 ps is actually counterproductive. This is not so for quadratic and cubic approximations, which we recommend for general use.
在仪器开发方面投入了大量努力,使得通过时间相关单光子计数检测皮秒荧光寿命成为可能。特别是,人们致力于显著缩小仪器响应函数(IRF)。然而,对分析方法的关注较少,尤其是卷积积分离散化问题,而短寿命的检测和量化严重依赖于此。我们表明,即使IRF比基于线性近似(LA)的标准离散化所需的宽度宽几倍,更好的离散化方法也能为短寿命产生可接受的结果。我们开发了一种适用于非指数模型的通用离散化方法,并明确纳入了零时间偏移。通过模拟,我们比较了线性近似、二次近似和三次近似。结果证明,后两者在检测短寿命方面要好得多,在这方面,它们没有差异,除非零时间偏移超过两个通道,此时使用三次近似会更有优势。我们表明,对于线性近似,在某些情况下将IRF缩小到半高宽(FWHM)小于150皮秒实际上会适得其反。而二次近似和三次近似则并非如此,我们建议普遍使用这两种方法。