• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康经济研究中置信区间和样本量计算的应用。

Use of confidence intervals and sample size calculations in health economic studies.

作者信息

Sacristán J A, Day S J, Navarro O, Ramos J, Hernández J M

机构信息

Clinical Research Department, Lilly SA, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Jul-Aug;29(7-8):719-25. doi: 10.1177/106002809502907-815.

DOI:10.1177/106002809502907-815
PMID:8520090
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the calculation and application of confidence intervals in pharmacoeconomic studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The increasing frequency with which pharmacoeconomic evaluations are made within clinical trials makes it possible to obtain information on the outputs and costs of an intervention in each patient of a sample under study. This allows the same statistical principles commonly used in clinical trials to be applied to cost or cost-effectiveness data. The methodology described in this article would allow expression of cost-effectiveness ratios in the form of confidence intervals. The calculation of the cost-effectiveness ratio by means of a confidence interval may have important practical consequences, both in decision-making on the choice of 1 intervention versus another and in calculating the size of the sample necessary to identify statistically significant differences, from both clinical and economic points of view.

CONCLUSIONS

The complementary use of confidence intervals and sensitivity analysis makes it possible to measure uncertainty related and unrelated to variability in sample data, allowing the decision to adopt 1 technology or another to be based on the most objective information available. Although several ethical and methodologic concerns remain to be addressed, this methodology may contribute to improving the more rational and efficient use of drugs.

摘要

目的

探讨药物经济学研究中置信区间的计算与应用。

资料综合

在临床试验中进行药物经济学评估的频率不断增加,使得获取关于研究样本中每位患者干预措施的产出和成本信息成为可能。这使得通常用于临床试验的相同统计原则能够应用于成本或成本效益数据。本文所述方法能够以置信区间的形式表达成本效益比。通过置信区间计算成本效益比可能会产生重要的实际影响,无论是在选择一种干预措施而非另一种干预措施的决策中,还是在从临床和经济角度计算识别统计学显著差异所需的样本量时。

结论

置信区间和敏感性分析的互补使用能够衡量与样本数据变异性相关和不相关的不确定性,从而使采用一种技术或另一种技术的决策基于可得的最客观信息。尽管仍有若干伦理和方法学问题有待解决,但该方法可能有助于改善药物的更合理和有效使用。

相似文献

1
Use of confidence intervals and sample size calculations in health economic studies.健康经济研究中置信区间和样本量计算的应用。
Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Jul-Aug;29(7-8):719-25. doi: 10.1177/106002809502907-815.
2
[Methods for analyzing uncertainty].[分析不确定性的方法]
Farm Hosp. 2011 May;35 Suppl 2:3-9. doi: 10.1016/S1130-6343(11)70016-2.
3
Estimation, power and sample size calculations for stochastic cost and effectiveness analysis.随机成本效益分析中的估计、效能和样本量计算。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(6):455-66. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725060-00002.
4
Power and sample size calculations for stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis.随机成本效益分析的功效与样本量计算。
Med Decis Making. 1998 Apr-Jun;18(2 Suppl):S81-92. doi: 10.1177/0272989X98018002S10.
5
Rank-order stability analysis (ROSA): testing pharmacoeconomic data.
Med Decis Making. 1995 Oct-Dec;15(4):367-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500407.
6
Statistical analysis in pharmacoeconomic studies. A review of current issues and standards.药物经济学研究中的统计分析。当前问题与标准综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Jun;9(6):506-16. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609060-00005.
7
Confidence intervals or surfaces? Uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness plane.置信区间还是曲面?成本效益平面上的不确定性。
Health Econ. 1998 Dec;7(8):723-40. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199812)7:8<723::aid-hec392>3.0.co;2-o.
8
Collection of health-economic data alongside clinical trials: is there a future for piggyback evaluations?在临床试验过程中收集卫生经济数据:附带评估是否有未来发展前景?
Value Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;8(1):67-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.03065.x.
9
[Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].新药的成本效益影响报销决策,但仍有改进空间。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A958.
10
Pharmacoeconomics--an aid to better decision-making.药物经济学——辅助更好决策的工具。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005 Sep;19 Suppl 1:34-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01285.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves revisited.重新审视成本效益可接受性曲线。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Feb;31(2):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0011-8.
2
Protocol for north of England and Scotland study of tonsillectomy and adeno-tonsillectomy in children (NESSTAC). A pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing surgical intervention with conventional medical treatment in children with recurrent sore throats.英格兰北部和苏格兰儿童扁桃体切除术及腺样体扁桃体切除术研究方案(NESSTAC)。一项实用的随机对照试验,比较复发性喉咙痛儿童手术干预与传统药物治疗的效果。
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2006 Aug 9;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-6-13.
3
Inference for the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and cost-effectiveness ratio.
成本效益可接受性曲线和成本效益比的推断。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Apr;17(4):339-49. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017040-00004.
4
Cost effectiveness of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Italian Cooperative Group for the Study of Meta-Analysis and the Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci.利鲁唑治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症的成本效益。意大利荟萃分析研究合作组及意大利药物观察站
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Aug;16(2):153-63. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00004.
5
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation in the real world. Effectiveness versus efficacy studies.真实世界中的药物经济学评估。有效性与疗效研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 May;15(5):423-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915050-00001.
6
Cost effectiveness of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I therapy in patients with ALS.重组人胰岛素样生长因子I治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Feb;15(2):179-95. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00006.
7
Bootstrap analyses of cost effectiveness in antidepressant pharmacotherapy.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 May;11(5):464-72. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00008.
8
Sensitivity analysis in health economic and pharmacoeconomic studies. An appraisal of the literature.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jan;11(1):75-88. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711010-00009.
9
Use of confidence intervals in health economic studies.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Oct;10(4):432-3. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610040-00010.