Finley P R, Warner M D, Peabody C A
Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Menlo Park Division, California, USA.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995 Sep;29(3):172-91. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199529030-00004.
Although lithium continues to be regarded as the treatment of choice for bipolar disorders, the clinical use of this mood stabiliser is associated with an extremely narrow therapeutic range. Relatively minor increases in serum concentrations may induce serious adverse sequelae, and concentrations within the therapeutic range may result in toxic reactions. The safety of combining lithium with other medications, therefore, is a major concern, and extensive clinical experience has served to identify several significant drug interactions. Lithium removal from the body is achieved almost exclusively via renal means. As a result, any medication that alters glomerular filtration rates or affects electrolyte exchange in the nephron may influence the pharmacokinetic disposition of lithium. Concomitant use of diuretics has long been associated with the development of lithium toxicity, but the risk of significant interactions varies with the site of pharmacological action of the diuretic in the renal tubule. Thiazide diuretics have demonstrated the greatest potential to increase lithium concentrations, with a 25 to 40% increase in concentrations often evident after initiation of therapy. Osmotic diuretics and methyl xanthines appear to have the opposite effect on lithium clearance and have been advocated historically as antidotes for lithium toxicity. Loop diuretics and potassium-sparing agents have minor variable effects. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have also been associated with lithium toxicity, although the relative interactive potential of specific NSAIDs is difficult to determine. Small prospective studies have demonstrated large interindividual differences in lithium clearance values associated with different NSAIDs. A growing body of evidence also suggests that ACE inhibitors may impair lithium elimination, but further investigations are needed to identify patients at risk. Anecdotal reports have linked numerous medications with the development of neurotoxicity without an apparent effect on the pharmacokinetic disposition of lithium. Antipsychotics, anticonvulsants and calcium antagonists have all be implicated in a sufficient number of case reports to warrant concern. As these medications have all been commonly coadministered with lithium, the relative risk of serious interactions appears to be quite low, but caution is advised.
尽管锂盐仍然被视为双相情感障碍的首选治疗药物,但这种心境稳定剂的临床应用与极其狭窄的治疗窗相关。血清浓度相对较小的升高可能会引发严重的不良后果,而治疗窗内的浓度也可能导致毒性反应。因此,锂盐与其他药物联合使用的安全性是一个主要问题,大量的临床经验已用于识别几种显著的药物相互作用。锂盐几乎完全通过肾脏途径从体内清除。因此,任何改变肾小球滤过率或影响肾单位中电解质交换的药物都可能影响锂盐的药代动力学处置。长期以来,利尿剂的同时使用一直与锂盐毒性的发生有关,但显著相互作用的风险因利尿剂在肾小管中的药理作用部位而异。噻嗪类利尿剂显示出升高锂盐浓度的最大潜力,治疗开始后浓度通常会明显升高25%至40%。渗透性利尿剂和甲基黄嘌呤对锂盐清除率似乎有相反的作用,并且在历史上一直被用作锂盐毒性的解毒剂。袢利尿剂和保钾剂的作用较小且多变。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)也与锂盐毒性有关,尽管特定NSAIDs的相对相互作用潜力难以确定。小型前瞻性研究表明,与不同NSAIDs相关的锂盐清除率值存在很大的个体差异。越来越多的证据还表明,血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂可能会损害锂盐的清除,但需要进一步研究以识别有风险的患者。轶事报道将许多药物与神经毒性的发生联系起来,而对锂盐的药代动力学处置没有明显影响。抗精神病药、抗惊厥药和钙拮抗剂都在足够数量的病例报告中被牵连,值得关注。由于这些药物都经常与锂盐联合使用,严重相互作用的相对风险似乎相当低,但建议谨慎使用。