Wilde M I, Balfour J A
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Drugs. 1995 Aug;50(2):364-95. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550020-00010.
The newer progestogens gestodene, desogestrel and norgestimate were developed in an attempt to produce agents with more selective progestational activity that would improve cycle control and minimise metabolic changes and adverse events while effectively preventing pregnancy. In clinical practice, gestodene is combined with ethinylestradiol in monophasic or triphasic combined oral contraceptive preparations. The drug has pharmacokinetic advantages over the other new progestogens in that it is active per se (the others are prodrugs) and has high bioavailability (approximately 100%). The ability of gestodene-containing oral contraceptives to inhibit ovulation is similar to that of preparations containing other progestogens although the required dosage is lower. In common with oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or norgestimate, and in contrast with those containing levonorgestrel, gestodene-containing preparations are associated with neutral or positive changes in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. The effects of gestodene preparations on coagulation parameters, like those of desogestrel and levonorgestrel, are balanced by changes in the fibrinolytic system. Although the impact of these changes on clinical cardiovascular end-points has not been determined, the altered lipid profile is not likely to have significant clinical relevance because of the predominantly thrombogenic nature of cardiovascular disease in oral contraceptive users. Pregnancy rates and Pearl Indices with gestodene-containing preparations are low and similar to those with preparations containing other progestogens. Most pregnancies are attributable to user failure. Cycle control appears to be better with gestodene preparations than with levonorgestrel preparations, and available data suggest that cycle control may also be better with monophasic gestodene/ethinylestradiol than with monophasic desogestrel- or norgestimate-containing preparations, and better with triphasic gestodene- than with triphasic levonorgestrel- or norgestimate-containing preparations. However, differences between the new progestogen-containing preparations need to be confirmed in further large-scale trials. The most common adverse events with gestodene/ethinylestradiol are headaches and breast tension; the incidence of short term adverse events, including acne, is similar to that with preparations containing other progestogens. Changes in blood pressure and bodyweight are negligible. There are no comparative data on the incidence of cardiovascular events with gestodene-containing and other combined preparations. While the risk of breast cancer appears to be increased with long term combined oral contraceptive use in certain patient subgroups, this risk needs to be balanced against the noncontraceptive benefits of these preparations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
新型孕激素孕二烯酮、去氧孕烯和诺孕酯的研发旨在生产具有更具选择性孕激素活性的药物,这类药物能改善月经周期调控,将代谢变化和不良事件降至最低,同时有效避孕。在临床实践中,孕二烯酮与炔雌醇联合用于单相或三相复方口服避孕药制剂。与其他新型孕激素相比,该药具有药代动力学优势,因为它本身具有活性(其他为前体药物)且生物利用度高(约100%)。含孕二烯酮的口服避孕药抑制排卵的能力与含其他孕激素制剂相似,不过所需剂量更低。与含去氧孕烯或诺孕酯的口服避孕药相同,与含左炔诺孕酮的避孕药相反,含孕二烯酮的制剂与脂质和碳水化合物代谢的中性或正向变化相关。孕二烯酮制剂对凝血参数的影响,与去氧孕烯和左炔诺孕酮制剂一样,被纤溶系统的变化所平衡。尽管这些变化对临床心血管终点的影响尚未确定,但由于口服避孕药使用者心血管疾病主要具有血栓形成的性质,改变的血脂谱不太可能具有显著的临床相关性。含孕二烯酮制剂的妊娠率和 Pearl 指数较低,与含其他孕激素的制剂相似。大多数妊娠归因于使用者未正确用药。含孕二烯酮制剂的月经周期调控似乎比含左炔诺孕酮的制剂更好,现有数据表明,单相孕二烯酮/炔雌醇制剂的月经周期调控可能也比单相含去氧孕烯或诺孕酯的制剂更好,三相孕二烯酮制剂比三相含左炔诺孕酮或诺孕酯的制剂更好。然而,含新型孕激素制剂之间的差异需要在进一步的大规模试验中得到证实。孕二烯酮/炔雌醇最常见的不良事件是头痛和乳房胀痛;包括痤疮在内的短期不良事件发生率与含其他孕激素的制剂相似。血压和体重变化可忽略不计。关于含孕二烯酮制剂和其他复方制剂心血管事件发生率没有可比数据。虽然在某些患者亚组中,长期使用复方口服避孕药似乎会增加患乳腺癌的风险,但这种风险需要与这些制剂的非避孕益处相权衡。(摘要截选至400词)