Larsen C F, Amadio P C, Gilula L A, Hodge J C
Department of Orthopaedics U-2162, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Hand Surg Am. 1995 Sep;20(5):757-64. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80426-5.
There is a lack of a generally agreed analysis of carpal instability that can assist in the diagnosis, give guidelines for treatment, and ensure unity when reporting results of treatment. Based on the literature and using six categories describing chronicity, constancy, etiology, location, direction, and pattern of the instability, we present a proposal for a standardized analysis. Using this analysis, an instability should be presented with information in all six categories. The analysis may be expanded and developed according to future needs.
目前缺乏一种能协助诊断、提供治疗指南并确保治疗结果报告一致性的关于腕关节不稳定的普遍认可的分析方法。基于文献并使用描述慢性、持续性、病因、位置、方向和不稳定模式的六个类别，我们提出了一种标准化分析的建议。使用这种分析方法，应呈现出不稳定在所有六个类别方面的信息。该分析可根据未来需求进行扩展和完善。
