Eloy R, Raul F, Pousse A, Mirhom R, Anana A, Grenier J F
Eur Surg Res. 1977;9(2):96-112. doi: 10.1159/000127930.
The vascular perfusion of the whole isolated intestine of the rat with homologous non-diluted blood is compared with classical in vivo experiments. During a 2 1/2-hour perfusion procedure no significant difference was noted between the two experimental schedules as far as haemodynamic, histological, mechanical and/or electrical activities of the gut are concerned. However, striking changes in the intestinal brush border enzyme output within the lumen appear between ex vivo and in vivo experiments. The early increase of intraluminal intestinal sucrase, already after the 95th min of perfusion indicate clearly the existence of a subcellular damage even not detectable by other tests of viability. Therefore, it is suggested that release of brush border enzymes might represent an interesting criterion of viability of in vitro or ex vivo preparations.
将大鼠整个离体肠段用同源未稀释血液进行血管灌注,并与经典的体内实验进行比较。在2个半小时的灌注过程中,就肠道的血流动力学、组织学、力学和/或电活动而言,两种实验方案之间未发现显著差异。然而,在体外和体内实验之间,肠腔内肠刷状缘酶的输出出现了显著变化。灌注第95分钟后,肠腔内蔗糖酶的早期增加清楚地表明,即使通过其他活力测试无法检测到,也存在亚细胞损伤。因此,有人认为刷状缘酶的释放可能是体外或离体制剂活力的一个有趣指标。