Thormann J, Schwarz F, Ensslen R
Eur J Cardiol. 1977 Mar;5(2):139-54.
15 different models of implanted demand pacemakers (61% Cordis models) in 156 patients were scrutinized owing to an announcement that had identified 3 faulty Cordis series and, as a consequence, had provoked considerable uncertainty among all pacemaker patients in the community. Malfunctions of the sensing, and reed switch mechanisms as well as changes in pacers' refractory periods were excluded by the electrical chest wall stimulation (ECWS), magnet waving (MW) or a combination of both. That those models suspected of malfunction show merely a drop in rate was verified. Established patterns of early rate drop guided the exchange for new units: no abrupt or complete rate drop occurred and no patient was lost. The application of indirect overdrive revealed that the blocking capacity for rapid rates was in Omni-Ectocor units less reliable than in Ectocor units. The characteristic reactions to MW and ECWS of the 15 demand pacemaker models were determined. Because both methods proved to be as easy to apply as they were beneficial for the follow-up, also in the uncommon situation created by the Cordis announcement, the application of both of these methods on a routine basis in pacemaker clinics is advocated.
由于一则公告指出3个Cordis系列起搏器存在故障,从而在社区内所有起搏器患者中引发了相当大的不确定性,因此对156名患者植入的15种不同型号的按需起搏器(61%为Cordis型号)进行了仔细检查。通过胸壁电刺激(ECWS)、磁铁摆动(MW)或两者结合,排除了感知和簧片开关机制故障以及起搏器不应期的变化。证实了那些怀疑有故障的型号仅仅是心率下降。早期心率下降的既定模式指导了新起搏器的更换:未出现突然或完全的心率下降,也没有患者死亡。间接超速驱动的应用表明,Omni-Ectocor型起搏器对快速心率的阻滞能力不如Ectocor型可靠。确定了15种按需起搏器型号对MW和ECWS的特征性反应。由于这两种方法被证明既易于应用又对随访有益,即使在Cordis公告造成的罕见情况下也是如此,因此提倡在起搏器诊所常规应用这两种方法。