Serman F, Benavides C, Sandoval J, Pazols R, Bermedo J, Fuenzalida R, Piuzzi C
Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital de Carabineros.
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1995;60(1):6-10; discussion 10-1.
The objective of our study was prospectively compare the effect in the rate of cesarean section of active labor management and of traditional labor management in primiparas with physiological term pregnancy. From september 1, 1993 to may 31, 1994, 145 primiparas with physiological term pregnancy were randomly assigned to one group of active labor management (study group, n = 75) and to one group of traditional labor management (control group, n = 70). Cesarean section rate was 9.3% in the study group and 20% in the control group (p < 0.05). There was no increase in fetal morbidity or mortality. Active labor management can reduce cesarean section rate in primiparas with physiological term pregnancy.
我们研究的目的是前瞻性地比较初产妇足月生理妊娠时,积极产程管理与传统产程管理对剖宫产率的影响。从1993年9月1日至1994年5月31日,145例足月生理妊娠的初产妇被随机分为积极产程管理组(研究组,n = 75)和传统产程管理组(对照组,n = 70)。研究组剖宫产率为9.3%,对照组为20%(p < 0.05)。胎儿发病率和死亡率没有增加。积极产程管理可降低初产妇足月生理妊娠时的剖宫产率。