Histopathological concordance of paired renal allograft biopsy cores. Effect on the diagnosis and management of acute rejection.

To assess the effect of sampling error on renal allograft biopsies, we determined the concordance of diagnoses between 2 biopsy samples from the same renal allograft and the frequency with which 1 biopsy sample would underdiagnose or lead to the undertreatment of acute rejection. Two core samples from the same allograft biopsy procedure were labeled as core A and core B and presented to both unblinded and blinded pathologists, and each pathologist independently assigned an acute and a chronic rejection grade. A set of clinical data with pertinent prebiopsy information was combined with either the core A or core B histopathological diagnosis and presented to 3 transplant nephrologists who made treatment recommendations for each combination. Two cores were obtained in 79 allograft biopsies. Core pairs differed by > or = 1 grade of acute rejection in 30% and 50% of cases for unblinded and blinded pathologist readings, respectively. Moderate or severe acute rejection would have been missed with a 1 core in 9.5% of cases, increasing to 25.6% if only biopsy pairs containing at least 1 reading of moderate or severe acute rejection are included. Therapy would have failed to be increased with a single core in 7.5% of cases, increasing to 10.5% if only pairs containing at least one recommendation of an increase in therapy are included. The use of 2 cores of renal allograft tissue provides better diagnostic information and thereby leads to appropriate increases in antirejection therapy without increasing the complication rate of the procedure.