• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[泌尿外科手术后的患者自控镇痛(PCA)]

[Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after urologic interventions].

作者信息

Gust V R, Weber R, Henn-Beilharz A, Krier C

机构信息

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universität Heidelberg.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1995;20(5):134-8.

PMID:8526966
Abstract

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a well-accepted technique in postoperative pain management. We used PCA in three different protocols to find the optimum application form. Our study compared 100 patients with radical prostatectomy or transperitoneal tumor nephrectomy in three groups using piritramide. Group 1 (n = 16) received 1.2 mg/h continuously and a 3 mg bolus with a lock-out time of 90 min. Group 2 (n = 30) received 0.8 mg/h continuously and a 3 mg bolus with a lock-out time of 60 min. Group 3 (n = 54) received the same continuous infusion, but the lock-out time was only 30 min. After 24 hours we evaluated the quality of analgesia using VAS scale. The quantity of piritramide was equal in all groups (35.1 mg). An average of seven bolus applications were made during the observation period. In 27.6% of the patients (group 1: 30.4%; group 2: 35.0%; group 3: 23.1%) the bolus demand was refused by programme. The analgesia level was satisfactory in each group, with a VAS value of 27. There was no respiratory depression observed. In conclusion, on-demand analgesia proved to be a good and practicable method in postoperative pain management. Although the dosage of piritramide was not different in the three groups, we recommend the protocol of group 3 because of the lower refusal of bolus application. Therefore, this seems to be the best patient-adapted application form. Even though respiratory complications in the group 3 scheme are not expected, monitoring of respiration and vigilance are recommended.

摘要

患者自控镇痛(PCA)是术后疼痛管理中一种广为接受的技术。我们采用三种不同方案使用PCA以找出最佳应用形式。我们的研究比较了100例行根治性前列腺切除术或经腹肿瘤肾切除术的患者,三组均使用匹米诺定。第一组(n = 16)持续接受1.2 mg/h的剂量,并给予3 mg的单次推注剂量,锁定时间为90分钟。第二组(n = 30)持续接受0.8 mg/h的剂量,并给予3 mg的单次推注剂量,锁定时间为60分钟。第三组(n = 54)接受相同的持续输注剂量,但锁定时间仅为30分钟。24小时后,我们使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估镇痛质量。所有组的匹米诺定用量相同(35.1 mg)。在观察期内平均进行了7次单次推注。27.6%的患者(第一组:30.4%;第二组:35.0%;第三组:23.1%)的单次推注需求被程序拒绝。每组的镇痛水平均令人满意,VAS值为27。未观察到呼吸抑制。总之,按需镇痛在术后疼痛管理中被证明是一种良好且可行的方法。尽管三组的匹米诺定剂量没有差异,但由于单次推注的拒绝率较低,我们推荐第三组的方案。因此,这似乎是最适合患者的应用形式。尽管预计第三组方案中不会出现呼吸并发症,但仍建议监测呼吸并保持警惕。

相似文献

1
[Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after urologic interventions].[泌尿外科手术后的患者自控镇痛(PCA)]
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1995;20(5):134-8.
2
[Combination of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain therapy].静脉自控镇痛与硬膜外麻醉联合用于术后疼痛治疗
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1996;21(3):69-75.
3
[Pain therapy after thoracotomies--systemic patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioid versus intercostal block and interpleural analgesia].开胸术后的疼痛治疗——阿片类药物的全身性患者自控镇痛(PCA)与肋间神经阻滞及胸膜间镇痛的比较
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1997;22(6):159-63.
4
Nalbuphine by PCA-pump for analgesia following hysterectomy: bolus application versus continuous infusion with bolus application.用于子宫切除术后镇痛的静脉自控镇痛泵给予纳布啡:单次给药与单次给药联合持续输注的比较
Eur J Pain. 2001;5(2):219-26. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0238.
5
On-demand analgesia with piritramide in children. A study on dosage specification and safety.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Feb;7(1):38-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1071046.
6
Continuous psoas and sciatic block after knee arthroplasty: good effects compared to epidural analgesia or i.v. opioid analgesia: a prospective study of 63 patients.膝关节置换术后持续腰大肌和坐骨神经阻滞:与硬膜外镇痛或静脉注射阿片类镇痛相比效果良好:一项对63例患者的前瞻性研究
Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):193-200. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013672.
7
The efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled remifentanil versus morphine anesthesia after coronary artery surgery.冠状动脉搭桥术后静脉自控瑞芬太尼与吗啡麻醉的疗效比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Apr;23(2):170-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
8
[Postoperative analgesia with tramadol and metamizol. Continual infusion versus patient controlled analgesia].[曲马多与安乃近用于术后镇痛。持续输注与患者自控镇痛的比较]
Anaesthesist. 2003 Jan;52(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s00101-002-0427-1.
9
Therapeutic effect of intrathecal morphine after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.腰椎后路椎间融合术后鞘内注射吗啡的治疗效果:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2379-86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181844ef2.
10
An audit of acute pain service in Central, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯中部急性疼痛服务的审计。
Saudi Med J. 2005 Feb;26(2):298-305.