• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综述文章:质子泵抑制剂的持续发展,尤其涉及泮托拉唑

Review article: the continuing development of proton pump inhibitors with particular reference to pantoprazole.

作者信息

Huber R, Kohl B, Sachs G, Senn-Bilfinger J, Simon W A, Sturm E

机构信息

Research Laboratories Byk Gulden, Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Aug;9(4):363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00394.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00394.x
PMID:8527612
Abstract

Inhibition of the gastric proton pump is gaining acceptance as the treatment of choice for severe gastrooesophageal reflux disease, and for treatment of duodenal and gastric ulceration. Three of these drugs are now available (omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole) and more are being developed. Proton pump inhibitors share the same core structure, but differ in terms of substituents on this core. The substitutions are able to modify some important chemical properties of the compounds. For example, pantoprazole is significantly more acid-stable than omeprazole or lansoprazole. E3810 is significantly less stable than the other compounds. We present an explantation for this finding that depends on the relative pK values for the pyridine and benzimidazole nitrogens, especially the former. Pantoprazole formulated in an enteric-coated tablet displays high bioavailability and linear pharmacokinetics whether on single or multiple dose regimens. Although all three proton pump inhibitors provide a similar chemical conversion to sulphenamides, which are highly reactive cysteine reagents, these reagents derivatize different cysteines in the extracytoplasmic or membrane domain of the pump and inhibit the pump at different rates. Whereas the differences in chemical reactivity can be explained by the solution chemistry of the compounds, selective derivatization of different cysteines on the protein argues for an involvement of pump structure in response to the presence of the proton pump inhibitor on its luminal surface. This suggests that the proton pump inhibitors, which were originally designed to take advantage of only the highly acidic space generated in the parietal cell by the production of the sulphenamide, are made even more selective by the protein they target. Pantoprazole is metabolized by a combination of phase I and phase II metabolism, and has also been shown to have a very low potential for drug interaction. Studies of acid secretion in man have shown this compound to be an effective and long lasting inhibitor of acid secretion. The pharmacodynamics explain the cumulative effect of repeated doses and maximal acid secretory capacity with a once daily dosage.

摘要

抑制胃质子泵作为重症胃食管反流病以及十二指肠和胃溃疡的首选治疗方法正逐渐被认可。目前已有三种此类药物(奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和泮托拉唑)上市,且更多药物正在研发中。质子泵抑制剂具有相同的核心结构,但该核心上的取代基有所不同。这些取代基能够改变化合物的一些重要化学性质。例如,泮托拉唑比奥美拉唑或兰索拉唑在酸性环境下更稳定。E3810比其他化合物稳定性明显更低。我们对这一发现给出了一种解释,该解释取决于吡啶和苯并咪唑氮的相对pK值,尤其是前者。肠溶包衣片剂型的泮托拉唑无论是单剂量还是多剂量给药方案,均显示出高生物利用度和线性药代动力学。尽管所有三种质子泵抑制剂都能发生类似的化学转化生成具有高反应活性的半磺酰胺,这些半磺酰胺是与半胱氨酸反应的试剂,但这些试剂会使泵的胞外或膜结构域中的不同半胱氨酸发生衍生化,并以不同速率抑制泵。虽然化合物的溶液化学性质可以解释其化学反应性的差异,但蛋白质上不同半胱氨酸的选择性衍生化表明,泵的结构参与了对其腔表面质子泵抑制剂存在的反应。这表明,质子泵抑制剂最初设计时仅利用壁细胞中由半磺酰胺产生的高酸性空间,而它们所作用的蛋白质使其具有了更高的选择性。泮托拉唑通过I相和II相代谢的联合作用进行代谢,并且还显示出药物相互作用的可能性非常低。人体胃酸分泌研究表明,该化合物是一种有效且持久的胃酸分泌抑制剂。药效学解释了重复给药的累积效应以及每日一次给药剂量下的最大胃酸分泌能力。

相似文献

1
Review article: the continuing development of proton pump inhibitors with particular reference to pantoprazole.综述文章:质子泵抑制剂的持续发展,尤其涉及泮托拉唑
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Aug;9(4):363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00394.x.
2
Metabolic interactions of the proton-pump inhibitors lansoprazole, omeprazole and pantoprazole with other drugs.质子泵抑制剂兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑和泮托拉唑与其他药物的代谢相互作用。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Oct;8 Suppl 1:S21-5. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199610001-00005.
3
Evaluation of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole in the treatment of acid-related diseases.奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑、泮托拉唑和雷贝拉唑治疗酸相关性疾病的疗效评估。
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Jan-Feb;40(1):52-62; quiz 121-3. doi: 10.1016/s1086-5802(16)31036-1.
4
Effects of pantoprazole, a novel H+/K+-ATPase inhibitor, on duodenal ulcerogenic and healing responses in rats: a comparative study with omeprazole and lansoprazole.新型H+/K+-ATP酶抑制剂泮托拉唑对大鼠十二指肠溃疡形成和愈合反应的影响:与奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑的比较研究
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Mar;14(3):251-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.1999.01843.x.
5
Pantoprazole. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders.泮托拉唑。其药理特性及在酸相关性疾病治疗中的应用综述。
Drugs. 1996 Mar;51(3):460-82. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651030-00012.
6
Pantoprazole: a new proton pump inhibitor.泮托拉唑:一种新型质子泵抑制剂。
Clin Ther. 2000 Nov;22(11):1268-93. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)83025-8.
7
Pantoprazole, a new proton-pump inhibitor, has a precise and predictable profile of activity.泮托拉唑是一种新型质子泵抑制剂,具有精确且可预测的活性特征。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Oct;8 Suppl 1:S15-20. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199610001-00004.
8
Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole.酸泵抑制剂的药代动力学、代谢及相互作用。重点关注奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和泮托拉唑。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Jul;31(1):9-28. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199631010-00002.
9
Interaction of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole with P-glycoprotein.奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和泮托拉唑与P-糖蛋白的相互作用。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2001 Dec;364(6):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s00210-001-0489-7.
10
Replacement of oral proton pump inhibitors with intravenous pantoprazole to effectively control gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.用静脉注射泮托拉唑替代口服质子泵抑制剂以有效控制卓艾综合征患者的胃酸分泌过多。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Dec;96(12):3274-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05325.x.

引用本文的文献

1
PBPK modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in different CYP2C19 genotypes.采用生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型预测不同CYP2C19基因型中泮托拉唑的药代动力学。
Arch Pharm Res. 2024 Jan;47(1):82-94. doi: 10.1007/s12272-023-01478-7. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
2
Peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs): a novel trend of research and development on targeted therapy, hype or hope?肽-药物偶联物(PDCs):靶向治疗研发的新趋势,是炒作还是希望?
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023 Feb;13(2):498-516. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Benzimidazole-1,2,3-triazole hybrid molecules: synthesis and study of their interaction with G-quadruplex DNA.
苯并咪唑-1,2,3-三唑杂化分子:其与G-四链体DNA相互作用的合成与研究
RSC Med Chem. 2021 Feb 22;12(3):416-429. doi: 10.1039/d0md00414f. eCollection 2021 Mar 1.
4
Advantages and Disadvantages of Long-term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use.长期使用质子泵抑制剂的利弊
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Apr 30;24(2):182-196. doi: 10.5056/jnm18001.
5
Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: current status and future concepts.幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗:现状与未来概念
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 14;20(18):5283-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5283.
6
Safety of the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂长期使用的安全性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 May 21;16(19):2323-30. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i19.2323.
7
Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous pantoprazole in paediatric intensive care patients.泮托拉唑静脉注射在儿科重症监护患者中的群体药代动力学
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Feb;67(2):216-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03328.x. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
8
Effect of proton pump inhibitors on gastric juice volume, gastric pH and gastric intramucosal pH in critically ill patients : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.质子泵抑制剂对危重症患者胃液量、胃内pH值及胃黏膜内pH值的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(12):777-82. doi: 10.2165/0044011-200828120-00005.
9
Stereoselective disposition of proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂的立体选择性分布
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(5):263-79. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828050-00001.
10
Pantoprazole does not affect performance in traffic-related safety tests: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers.泮托拉唑对交通相关安全性测试中的表现无影响:一项在健康志愿者中进行的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 1998;16(1):63-70. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199816010-00008.