Suppr超能文献

使用五种分离系统对来自骨髓、脐带血和外周血(为单采做准备)的CD34+细胞的纯度和富集度进行比较。

Comparison of purity and enrichment of CD34+ cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord and peripheral blood (primed for apheresis) using five separation systems.

作者信息

de Wynter E A, Coutinho L H, Pei X, Marsh J C, Hows J, Luft T, Testa N G

机构信息

Cancer Research Campaign Department of Experimental Haematology, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Stem Cells. 1995 Sep;13(5):524-32. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530130510.

Abstract

Interest in the isolation and characterization of primitive hemopoietic cells in both the clinical and research fields has rapidly increased. In parallel, different purification systems have been developed to isolate these cells. We have compared five different methods for separation of CD34+ cells from human umbilical cord blood, normal bone marrow and apheresis harvests and analyzed purity, recovery, yield and enrichment of colony forming cells (CFC) for each individual system. Our results indicate that the most reliable methods of purification for all samples were fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) which consistently yielded high purities (> 70%) and enrichment of CFC. In this respect the enrichment of CFC from the MACS was superior to all the other systems including FACS. Similar results (> 70%) for purity were obtained using avidin affinity columns and a biotinylated antibody but neither yield nor CFC enrichment approached the values achieved with MACS. On average CFC enrichment using these affinity columns was greater than that observed for FACS while the purity was comparable. Both CELLector flasks and immunomagnetic beads coated with CD34 antibodies were less effective in our hands in separating purified populations of progenitor cells. Both purity and CFC enrichment of CD34+ cells using these methods were at least 50% lower than obtained with either FACS, MACS or affinity columns.

摘要

临床和研究领域对原始造血细胞的分离与特性研究的兴趣迅速增长。与此同时,已开发出不同的纯化系统来分离这些细胞。我们比较了从人脐带血、正常骨髓和单采收获物中分离CD34+细胞的五种不同方法,并分析了每个单独系统的集落形成细胞(CFC)的纯度、回收率、产量和富集情况。我们的结果表明,对所有样本而言,最可靠的纯化方法是荧光激活细胞分选(FACS)和磁激活细胞分选(MACS),它们始终能产生高纯度(>70%)并富集CFC。在这方面,MACS对CFC的富集优于包括FACS在内的所有其他系统。使用抗生物素蛋白亲和柱和生物素化抗体获得的纯度结果相似(>70%),但产量和CFC富集均未达到MACS所达到的值。平均而言,使用这些亲和柱的CFC富集大于FACS,而纯度相当。在我们手中,CELLector培养瓶和包被有CD34抗体的免疫磁珠在分离纯化祖细胞群体方面效果较差。使用这些方法的CD34+细胞的纯度和CFC富集均比使用FACS、MACS或亲和柱至少低50%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验