Mosteller F
Department of Statistics and of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University, USA.
Future Child. 1995 Summer-Fall;5(2):113-27.
The Tennessee class size project is a three-phase study designed to determine the effect of smaller class size in the earliest grades on short-term and long-term pupil performance. The first phase of this project, termed Project STAR (for Student-Teacher Achievement Ratio), was begun in 1985, when Lamar Alexander was governor of Tennessee. Governor Alexander, who later served as secretary of education in the cabinet of President George Bush, had made education a top priority for his second term. The legislature and the educational community of Tennessee were mindful of a promising study of the benefits of small class size carried out in nearby Indiana, but were also aware of the costs associated with additional classrooms and teachers. Wishing to obtain data on the effectiveness of reduced class size before committing additional funds, the Tennessee legislature authorized this four-year study in which results obtained in kindergarten, first, second, and third grade classrooms of 13 to 17 pupils were compared with those obtained in classrooms of 22 to 25 pupils and in classrooms of this larger size where the teacher was assisted by a paid aide. Both standardized and curriculum-based tests were used to assess and compare the performance of some 6,500 pupils in about 330 classrooms at approximately 80 schools in the areas of reading, mathematics, and basic study skills. After four years, it was clear that smaller classes did produce substantial improvement in early learning and cognitive studies and that the effect of small class size on the achievement of minority children was initially about double that observed for majority children, but in later years, it was about the same. The second phase of the project, called the Lasting Benefits Study, was begun in 1989 to determine whether these perceived benefits persisted. Observations made as a part of this phase confirmed that the children who were originally enrolled in smaller classes continued to perform better than their grade-mates (whose school experience had begun in larger classes) when they were returned to regular-sized classes in later grades. Under the third phase, Project Challenge, the 17 economically poorest school districts were given small classes in kindergarten, first, second, and third grades. These districts improved their end-of-year standing in rank among the 139 districts from well below average to above average in reading and mathematics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
田纳西州班级规模项目是一项分三个阶段的研究,旨在确定低年级较小的班级规模对学生短期和长期学习成绩的影响。该项目的第一阶段,即STAR项目(学生-教师成就比率项目),始于1985年,当时拉马尔·亚历山大是田纳西州州长。亚历山大州长后来在乔治·布什总统内阁中担任教育部长,他将教育作为其第二个任期的首要任务。田纳西州的立法机构和教育界注意到在附近的印第安纳州进行的一项关于小班规模益处的有前景的研究,但也意识到增加教室和教师的成本。田纳西州立法机构希望在投入额外资金之前获得关于缩小班级规模有效性的数据,于是授权进行这项为期四年的研究,将13至17名学生的幼儿园、一年级、二年级和三年级教室中取得的结果,与22至25名学生的教室以及有付费助教协助教师的更大规模教室中取得的结果进行比较。标准化测试和基于课程的测试都被用于评估和比较约80所学校约330间教室中约6500名学生在阅读、数学和基础学习技能方面的表现。四年后,很明显较小的班级确实在早期学习和认知研究方面带来了显著改善,而且小班规模对少数族裔儿童成绩提升的影响最初约为多数族裔儿童的两倍,但在后来几年,两者大致相同。该项目的第二阶段,即持久益处研究,始于1989年,以确定这些明显的益处是否持续存在。作为此阶段一部分所做的观察证实,最初就读于小班的孩子在后来回到常规规模班级时,其表现仍优于同班同学(他们的学校经历始于大班)。在第三阶段,即挑战项目中,17个经济最贫困的学区在幼儿园、一年级、二年级和三年级被安排了小班。这些学区在阅读和数学方面的年终排名在139个学区中从远低于平均水平提升到了高于平均水平。(摘要截选至400字)