Suppr超能文献

Long-term care insurance and alternatives: a comparison of employer and individual policy markets.

作者信息

McSweeney M H

机构信息

Public Administration Institute, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 1995 Fall;22(1):72-81.

PMID:8528827
Abstract

This article presents findings from a recently completed Health Insurance Association of America-sponsored survey that sought to measure the extent to which long-term care insurers paid for newer, long-term care alternatives. The focus of the survey was on payment for three services: adult day care, board and care homes, and assisted living facilities. The survey also collected information on companies offering reimbursement for these services under an alternate care benefit (i.e., a plan of nonconventional care and services that can serve as an alternative to more costly inpatient nursing home care). Survey data showed that long-term care insurance sold in employer markets reimburses a richer set of alternative long-term care benefits than policies sold in individual markets. In addition, the majority of employer market companies reimburse for alternatives under their base policy, recognizing the importance of payment for noninstitutional, long-term care alternatives.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验