两种牙种植系统的临床与微生物学比较

Clinical and microbiologic comparisons of two dental implant systems.

作者信息

Maxson B B, Syed S A, Dominguez B L

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine, Pathology, Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1078, USA.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Diagn. 1992;3:31-5.

PMID:8529149

Abstract

Clinical soft tissue examination and microbiologic findings were compared for two dental implant systems. Of 20 edentulous patients, ten had been reconstructed with a transosteal implant of gold alloy, TMI-system (Bosker), of and ten with endosseous implants of titanium (Brånemark-system). Clinical parameters evaluated included plaque, gingivitis, sulcus depth and bleeding on probing. Plaque samples from 14 patients were cultured for selected periodontal pathogens. Although some differences in soft tissue clinical behavior were identified, the incidence and prevalence of selected periodontal pathogens appeared to be similar.

摘要

对两种牙种植系统的临床软组织检查结果和微生物学发现进行了比较。在20例无牙患者中，10例采用了金合金穿骨种植体（TMI系统，Bosker）进行修复，另外10例采用了钛质骨内种植体（Brånemark系统）。评估的临床参数包括菌斑、牙龈炎、龈沟深度和探诊出血。对14例患者的菌斑样本进行培养，以检测特定的牙周病原体。虽然在软组织临床行为方面发现了一些差异，但特定牙周病原体的发病率和流行率似乎相似。