Sahni R, Schulze K F, Stefanski M, Myers M M, Fifer W P
Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Dev Psychobiol. 1995 Mar;28(2):85-101. doi: 10.1002/dev.420280203.
Thirty-five healthy, premature infants, ranging from 30-39 weeks postconceptional age, were observed continuously for 6 to 24 hr. Behavioral state and electroencephalographic patterns were coded for each minute. Using these data, three questions regarding coding of states of sleep were addressed: What is the concordance between behavioral codes and specific EEG patterns? Does the concordance between behavioral codes and EEG patterns change with postconceptional age? What range of error can be expected when observation periods shorter than 24-hr are used to estimate the daily distribution of quiet sleep (QS) and active sleep (AS)? With behavioral codes as the standard, concordances of EEG patterns for QS and AS were 72.5 and 92.1% respectively. With EEG patterns as the standard, behavioral codes for QS and AS agreed 83.0 and 88.9%. Agreement between behavioral codes and EEG patterns for QS increased with age. Finally, variation in estimates of the daily distribution of QS and AS decreased dramatically as the length of observation increased from 3 to 24 hr.
对35名健康的早产婴儿进行了持续6至24小时的观察,这些婴儿的孕龄在30至39周之间。每分钟记录行为状态和脑电图模式。利用这些数据,探讨了关于睡眠状态编码的三个问题:行为编码与特定脑电图模式之间的一致性如何?行为编码与脑电图模式之间的一致性是否随孕龄而变化?当使用短于24小时的观察期来估计安静睡眠(QS)和活跃睡眠(AS)的每日分布时,预期的误差范围是多少?以行为编码为标准,QS和AS的脑电图模式一致性分别为72.5%和92.1%。以脑电图模式为标准,QS和AS的行为编码一致性分别为83.0%和88.9%。QS的行为编码与脑电图模式之间的一致性随年龄增加。最后,随着观察时长从3小时增加到24小时,QS和AS每日分布估计值的变化显著减小。