Suppr超能文献

Comparison among different ovarian stimulation regimens for assisted procreation procedures in patients with endometriosis.

作者信息

Chedid S, Camus M, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem A C, Devroey P

机构信息

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University, Belgium.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1995 Sep;10(9):2406-11. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136308.

Abstract

The objective of our study was to establish the most adequate ovarian stimulation regimen for assisted procreation in endometriotic patients. It consisted of a retrospective analysis comparing the use of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) buserelin either for 3 months or for 3 weeks and continued with ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), and the use of clomiphene citrate in association with HMG for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer, gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) and zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). A total of 145 patients with endometriosis in 174 cycles were divided into two groups according to the revised American Fertility Society staging of the disease (group A, stages 1 and 2; group B, stages 3 and 4). The use of GnRHa significantly increased the number of oocytes retrieved. GnRH analogues for 3 months gave the highest fertilization rate for groups A and B. The cleavage, pregnancy and delivery rates, although higher in the groups treated with analogues, did not reach statistical significance. A higher number of patients had an embryo transfer in the groups treated with GnRHa (P < 0.05). Treatment with GnRHa for either 3 months or for 3 weeks proved to be more efficient than clomiphene citrate-HMG for assisted procreation procedures in patients with endometriosis.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验