Alster D, Feilzer A J, De Gee A J, Davidson C L
Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam, ACTA, The Netherlands.
J Dent Res. 1995 Nov;74(11):1745-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740110501.
As a rule, cast restorations do not allow for free curing contraction of the resin composite luting cement. In a rigid situation, the resulting contraction stress is inversely proportional to the resin layer thickness. Adhesive technology has demonstrated, however, that thin joints may be considerably stronger than thicker ones. To investigate the effects of layer thickness and contraction stress on the tensile strength of resin composite joints, we cured cylindrical samples of a chemically initiated resin composite (Clearfil F2) in restrained conditions and subsequently loaded them in tension. The samples had a diameter of 5.35 mm and thicknesses of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 microns, 1.4 mm, or 2.7 mm. None of the samples fractured due to contraction stress prior to tensile loading. Tensile strength decreased gradually from 62 +/- 2 MPa for the 50-microns layer to 31 +/- 4 MPa for the 2.7-mm layer. The failures were exclusively cohesive in resin for layers between 50 and 400 microns thick. Between 500 and 700 microns, the failures were cohesive or mixed adhesive/cohesive, while the 1.4- and 2.7-mm layers always failed in a mixed adhesive/cohesive mode. For the resin composite tested, the contraction stress did not endanger the cohesive strength. It was concluded that if adhesion to tooth structure were improved, thinner adhesive joints might enhance the clinical success of luted restorations.
通常情况下,铸造修复体不允许树脂复合粘结水门汀自由固化收缩。在刚性条件下,产生的收缩应力与树脂层厚度成反比。然而,粘结技术表明,薄粘结层可能比厚粘结层强得多。为了研究层厚度和收缩应力对树脂复合粘结层拉伸强度的影响,我们在受限条件下固化了化学引发树脂复合材料(Clearfil F2)的圆柱形样本,随后对其进行拉伸加载。样本直径为5.35毫米,厚度分别为50、100、200、300、400、500、600和700微米、1.4毫米或2.7毫米。在拉伸加载之前,没有一个样本因收缩应力而断裂。拉伸强度从50微米层的62±2兆帕逐渐降低到2.7毫米层的31±4兆帕。对于厚度在50至400微米之间的层,失效完全发生在树脂的内聚破坏。在500至700微米之间,失效是内聚破坏或粘结/内聚混合破坏,而1.4毫米和2.7毫米的层总是以粘结/内聚混合模式失效。对于所测试的树脂复合材料,收缩应力并未危及内聚强度。得出的结论是,如果改善与牙体组织的粘结,更薄的粘结层可能会提高粘结修复体的临床成功率。