Suppr超能文献

无细胞百日咳疫苗在家庭暴露后幼儿期的有效性。

Efficacy of acellular pertussis vaccine in early childhood after household exposure.

作者信息

Schmitt H J, von König C H, Neiss A, Bogaerts H, Bock H L, Schulte-Wissermann H, Gahr M, Schult R, Folkens J U, Rauh W, Clemens R

机构信息

Children's Hospital, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Jan 3;275(1):37-41.

PMID:8531284
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a three-dose primary vaccination with a diphtheria-tetanus tricomponent acellular pertussis vaccine against "typical" pertussis, defined as a spasmodic cough of 21 days or longer with confirmation of Bordetella pertussis infection by culture or serology.

DESIGN

Passive monitoring for suspected first household (index) cases of typical pertussis in six areas in Germany comprising 22,505 children vaccinated with study vaccine at 3, 4, and 5 months of age. Blinded, prospective follow-up of household contacts of index cases for incidence and progression of pertussis.

SETTING

Six areas in Germany with a high incidence of pertussis.

SUBJECTS

Four hundred fifty-three households with index cases comprising 360 evaluable contacts eligible for analysis of vaccine efficacy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Vaccine efficacy from attack rates of pertussis in household contacts classified by vaccination status.

RESULTS

Of the 173 nonvaccinated household contacts, 96 developed typical pertussis, compared with seven of 112 contacts vaccinated with acellular pertussis vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was consequently calculated to be 88.7% (95% confidence interval, 76.6% to 94.6%). Protection did not wane until at least the time recommended for booster vaccination. None of the analyzed potential confounding factors--age, socioeconomic status, erythromycin treatment, household composition, center effect, and selection bias--influenced study results in favor of the vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS

Under conditions of intense household exposure, primary vaccination with acellular vaccine protected against pertussis until at least the time recommended for booster vaccination. The vaccine can be expected to be equally or more effective in settings with lower infectious pressure.

摘要

目的

评估三剂次白喉 - 破伤风 - 三联无细胞百日咳疫苗基础免疫接种对“典型”百日咳的效力,“典型”百日咳定义为痉挛性咳嗽持续21天或更长时间,且通过培养或血清学确诊为百日咳博德特氏菌感染。

设计

对德国六个地区疑似首例家庭(索引)典型百日咳病例进行被动监测,这六个地区共有22,505名儿童在3、4和5月龄时接种了研究用疫苗。对索引病例的家庭接触者进行盲法前瞻性随访,以观察百日咳的发病率和病程。

地点

德国百日咳高发的六个地区。

研究对象

453户有索引病例的家庭,包括360名符合条件的可评估接触者,用于分析疫苗效力。

主要观察指标

根据疫苗接种状态分类的家庭接触者中百日咳的发病率计算疫苗效力。

结果

173名未接种疫苗的家庭接触者中,96人发生了典型百日咳,而112名接种无细胞百日咳疫苗的接触者中只有7人发病。因此计算出疫苗效力为88.7%(95%置信区间,76.6%至94.6%)。至少在推荐进行加强免疫的时间之前,保护作用没有减弱。分析的潜在混杂因素(年龄、社会经济地位、红霉素治疗、家庭构成、中心效应和选择偏倚)均未对支持疫苗的研究结果产生影响。

结论

在家庭暴露密集的情况下,无细胞疫苗基础免疫接种对百日咳具有保护作用,至少持续到推荐进行加强免疫的时间。预计该疫苗在感染压力较低的环境中同样有效或更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验