Suppr超能文献

[用于动态睡眠呼吸暂停诊断的Sleep-Doc-Porti系统的验证]

[Validation of the Sleep-Doc-Porti system for ambulatory sleep apnea diagnosis].

作者信息

Teschler H, Hoheisel G, Schumann H, Wagner B, Konietzko N

机构信息

Abteilung Pneumologie-Universitätsklinik, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 1995 Sep;49(9):496-501.

PMID:8532643
Abstract

The aim of our study was to validate the Sleep-Doc-Porti-System (SDPS), a simple device to monitor patients suspected of suffering from obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). This digital recording system measures nasal flow, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and body position. To assess the reliability of results obtained by the SDPS, cardiorespiratory polygraphy and SDPS were performed simultaneously on 48 patients with OSAS (apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) 26 +/- 25) and 10 habitual snorers (AHI = 0.6 +/- 0.7). There was a strong correlation between the apnea index (AI) recorded by the SDPS and the AI (r = 98; p < 0.001) and AHI (r = 97; p < 0.001) obtained by polygraphy. However, the SDPS significantly underestimated the respiratory disturbance index, because hypopneas were not detected by the recorder (AI by SDPS vs. AHI by polygraphy: 19.6 +/- 24.4 vs. 26.7 +/- 25.3; p < 0.01). With the cardiorespiratory polygraphy as standard, the sensitivity of the SDPS in detecting OSAS ranged between 71 and 72%, and the specificity between 91 and 100%, depending on the AHI values of 5, 10, 15 and 20 chosen to define severity of the disease. Reproducibility was assessed in 23 patients who underwent in-home monitoring in two consecutive nights and yielded no evidence of a "first night effect" (AI: 30.9 +/- 24.3 vs. 33.4 +/- 23.3; p = n.s.). In 18 OSAS patients in-home monitoring was able to demonstrate the worsening effect of alcohol on the disease by a significant increase in the AI comparing the night with and without alcohol (AI: 23.1 +/- 11.9 vs. 35.2 +/- 14.8; p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们研究的目的是验证睡眠文档便携式系统(SDPS),这是一种用于监测疑似患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者的简易设备。该数字记录系统可测量鼻气流、血氧饱和度、心率和体位。为评估SDPS所得结果的可靠性,对48例OSAS患者(呼吸暂停/低通气指数(AHI)为26±25)和10例习惯性打鼾者(AHI = 0.6±0.7)同时进行了心肺多导睡眠图和SDPS检查。SDPS记录的呼吸暂停指数(AI)与多导睡眠图得出的AI(r = 0.98;p < 0.001)和AHI(r = 0.97;p < 0.001)之间存在很强的相关性。然而,SDPS显著低估了呼吸紊乱指数,因为记录仪未检测到低通气(SDPS记录的AI与多导睡眠图记录的AHI相比:19.6±24.4 vs. 26.7±25.3;p < 0.01)。以心肺多导睡眠图为标准,根据用于定义疾病严重程度的5、10、15和20的AHI值,SDPS检测OSAS的敏感性在71%至72%之间,特异性在91%至100%之间。对23例连续两晚进行家庭监测的患者评估了可重复性,未发现“首夜效应”的证据(AI:30.9±24.3 vs. 33.4±23.3;p = 无显著差异)。在18例OSAS患者中,家庭监测能够通过比较饮酒当晚和未饮酒当晚AI的显著增加,证明酒精对该病的恶化作用(AI:分别为23.1±11.9和35.2±14.8;p < 0.01)。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验