• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积液的多参数流式细胞术DNA分析:36例前瞻性研究并与常规细胞学和免疫组织化学比较

Multiparameter flow cytometric DNA analysis of effusions: a prospective study of 36 cases compared with routine cytology and immunohistochemistry.

作者信息

Joseph M G, Banerjee D, Harris P, Gibson S, McFadden R G

机构信息

Department of Pathology, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 1995 Aug;8(6):686-93.

PMID:8532707
Abstract

Single-parameter flow cytometry (SFCM) is limited in its ability to detect aneuploid and diploid malignant cells or accurately estimate S-phase fractions (SPF) in effusions because of the high degree of contamination by benign mesothelial cells and inflammatory cells. We examined 36 pleural and peritoneal fluids by conventional cytology and multiparameter FCM (MFCM) to analyze the DNA content of cells expressing epithelial markers cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, BRST-1, or BRST-3 (B72.3) and compared the results to those found with SCFM. The cases were also studied by immunohistochemistry using the same antibody panel. By routine cytology, 14 of the 36 cases were classified as carcinomas, 11 as reactive, 1 as mesothelioma, and 10 as suspicious. MFCM allowed reclassification of 5 of the 10 suspicious cases as carcinomas and the remaining 5 as reactive cases based on ploidy and marker expression. Whereas SFCM detected only 13 nondiploid carcinomas, MFCM detected 4 diploid and 15 nondiploid carcinomas. All reactive cases were diploid by SFCM or MFCM. The mesothelioma case showed were distinct peaks by MFCM, a diploid peak with SPF of 13.4% and a tetraploid peak with SPF of 36.1%. The SPF of the nondiploid carcinomas ranged from 5.9 to 50.4% and diploid carcinomas, from 3.5 to 14.5% when gated on epithelial cells. The reactive cases had SPF ranging from 0.4 to 4.4%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

单参数流式细胞术(SFCM)在检测非整倍体和二倍体恶性细胞或准确估计积液中的S期分数(SPF)方面存在局限性,因为良性间皮细胞和炎性细胞的污染程度很高。我们通过传统细胞学和多参数流式细胞术(MFCM)检查了36份胸腔和腹腔积液,以分析表达上皮标志物细胞角蛋白、上皮膜抗原、癌胚抗原、BRST-1或BRST-3(B72.3)的细胞的DNA含量,并将结果与SFCM的结果进行比较。这些病例还使用相同的抗体组进行了免疫组织化学研究。通过常规细胞学检查,36例病例中有14例被分类为癌,11例为反应性,1例为间皮瘤,10例为可疑。基于倍性和标志物表达,MFCM将10例可疑病例中的5例重新分类为癌,其余5例为反应性病例。虽然SFCM仅检测到13例非二倍体癌,但MFCM检测到4例二倍体癌和15例非二倍体癌。所有反应性病例通过SFCM或MFCM检测均为二倍体。间皮瘤病例通过MFCM显示出明显的峰,一个SPF为13.4%的二倍体峰和一个SPF为36.1%的四倍体峰。当以上皮细胞设门时,非二倍体癌的SPF范围为5.9%至50.4%,二倍体癌的SPF范围为3.5%至14.5%。反应性病例的SPF范围为0.4%至4.4%。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Multiparameter flow cytometric DNA analysis of effusions: a prospective study of 36 cases compared with routine cytology and immunohistochemistry.积液的多参数流式细胞术DNA分析:36例前瞻性研究并与常规细胞学和免疫组织化学比较
Mod Pathol. 1995 Aug;8(6):686-93.
2
Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.恶性间皮瘤:免疫组织化学和DNA倍体分析作为鉴别胸膜和腹膜积液中间皮瘤与良性反应性间皮细胞增生及腺癌的方法。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Oct;120(10):959-66.
3
Image analysis and flow cytometric DNA studies of benign and malignant body cavity fluids: reappraisal of the role of current methods in the differential diagnosis of reactive versus malignant conditions.良性和恶性体腔液的图像分析及流式细胞术DNA研究:对当前方法在反应性与恶性疾病鉴别诊断中作用的重新评估
Mod Pathol. 2000 Jul;13(7):788-96. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880137.
4
Image cytometry: an aid for cytological diagnosis of pleural effusions.图像细胞术:胸腔积液细胞学诊断的辅助手段
Diagn Cytopathol. 2005 Mar;32(3):173-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.20205.
5
Evaluation of flow cytometric immunophenotyping and DNA analysis for detection of malignant cells in serosal cavity fluids.流式细胞术免疫表型分析及DNA分析用于检测浆膜腔积液中恶性细胞的评估
Diagn Cytopathol. 2009 Jul;37(7):498-504. doi: 10.1002/dc.21047.
6
DNA flow cytometry of pleural effusions. Comparison with pathology for the diagnosis of malignancy.胸腔积液的DNA流式细胞术。与病理检查在恶性肿瘤诊断中的比较。
Anal Quant Cytol. 1983 Mar;5(1):19-27.
7
The use of CDKN2A deletion as a diagnostic marker for malignant mesothelioma in body cavity effusions.CDKN2A缺失作为体腔积液中恶性间皮瘤诊断标志物的应用。
Cancer. 2003 Feb 25;99(1):51-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10923.
8
Cytology, immunopathology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Lab Invest. 1988 Jun;58(6):725-32.
9
Detection of tumor cells in body cavity fluids by flow cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis.通过流式细胞术和免疫细胞化学分析检测体腔液中的肿瘤细胞。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 Aug;34(8):528-41. doi: 10.1002/dc.20496.
10
Comparison of nucleolar organiser regions and DNA flow cytometry in the evaluation of pleural effusion.核仁组织区与DNA流式细胞术在胸腔积液评估中的比较
Thorax. 1994 Nov;49(11):1152-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.11.1152.

引用本文的文献

1
Serous effusions: diagnosis of malignancy beyond cytomorphology. An analytic review.浆液性积液:超越细胞形态学的恶性肿瘤诊断。一项分析性综述。
Postgrad Med J. 2003 Oct;79(936):569-74. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.936.569.
2
Value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cholesterol assays of ascitic fluid in cases of inconclusive cytology.在细胞学检查结果不明确的病例中,腹水癌胚抗原(CEA)和胆固醇检测的价值。
J Clin Pathol. 2001 Nov;54(11):831-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.11.831.
3
Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of serous effusions and peritoneal washings: comparison with immunocytochemistry and morphological findings.
浆液性积液和腹腔灌洗的流式细胞免疫表型分析:与免疫细胞化学及形态学结果的比较
J Clin Pathol. 2000 Jul;53(7):513-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.7.513.
4
Differential diagnostic significance of the paucity of HLA-I antigens on metastatic breast carcinoma cells in effusions.积液中转移性乳腺癌细胞上HLA-I抗原缺乏的鉴别诊断意义
Pathol Oncol Res. 1999;5(1):32-5. doi: 10.1053/paor.1999.0032.
5
Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization improves the detection of malignant cells in effusions from breast cancer patients.间期荧光原位杂交技术可提高乳腺癌患者胸腔积液中恶性细胞的检测率。
Br J Cancer. 1997;75(3):403-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.65.