Sharpe P C, Morrow J, Trimble E R
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast.
Ulster Med J. 1995 Oct;64(2):151-6.
An audit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anticonvulsants was performed to assess both its use and misuse in the management of patients with epilepsy. Over a four week period all samples received for phenytoin, carbamazepine, sodium valproate and phenobarbitone assays were included in the audit. The aims were to establish the source of the specimens, the reasons for the requests and to ascertain what action, if any, would be taken when the result of the assay was provided. A total of 163 separate assays were performed over the four week period (43 phenytoin, 74 carbamazepine, 41 valproate, 5 phenobarbitone). Only 18.7% of all requests originated from the adult neurology department. The vast majority of tests had been ordered by junior medical staff (only 10% by consultants) and approximately 50% were 'routine' with no satisfactory clinical reason for the request offered. There was a tendency to manipulate prescribed doses on the basis of drug levels alone without taking the clinical picture into consideration. These results demonstrate a general ignorance, especially amongst junior medical staff, of the value of TDM of anticonvulsants, and reinforce the need for both an educative and interpretive service to be provided by the Chemical Pathology Department.
开展了一项抗惊厥药物治疗药物监测(TDM)审核,以评估其在癫痫患者管理中的使用情况和误用情况。在四周时间内,所有送检苯妥英、卡马西平、丙戊酸钠和苯巴比妥检测的样本都纳入了审核范围。目的是确定样本来源、申请检测的原因,并确定在提供检测结果后会采取何种行动(如有)。在这四周期间共进行了163次独立检测(43次苯妥英检测、74次卡马西平检测、41次丙戊酸检测、5次苯巴比妥检测)。所有申请中只有18.7%来自成人神经科。绝大多数检测是由初级医务人员开出的医嘱(只有10%由会诊医生开出),约50%的检测是“常规”检测,申请时没有提供令人满意的临床理由。存在仅根据药物水平调整处方剂量而不考虑临床情况的倾向。这些结果表明,尤其是初级医务人员,对抗惊厥药物TDM的价值普遍缺乏认识,这也凸显了临床病理科提供教育和解读服务的必要性。