Kulp T D, Fuld K
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824, USA.
Vision Res. 1995 Nov;35(21):2967-83. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00049-6.
The Jameson and Hurvich opponent-colors model of hue and saturation was tested for spectral and non-spectral lights. Four observers described the color of lights by scaling hue and saturation. The lights ranged from 440 to 640 nm and consisted of five purities: 1.0, 0.80, 0.60, 0.40 and 0.20. Admixtures of monochromatic and a xenon-white light yielded the different colorimetric purities. For each subject, chromatic response functions were measured by the method of hue cancellation at each purity, and an achromatic response function was measured by the method of heterochromatic flicker photometry for spectral lights. Chromatic response functions measured for a particular purity and the achromatic response function were used to predict hue and saturation for that purity. The model successfully predicted hue at each level of purity, but failed to predict precisely the Abney effect. The model made relatively poor predictions of saturation, tending to overestimate short-wave lights and underestimate long-wave lights. An additional experiment found that stimulus parameters that favor rod contribution weaken the model's predictions of saturation, while stimulus parameters that do not favor rod contribution improve the model's predictions of saturation.
詹姆森和赫尔维奇的色调与饱和度对立色模型针对光谱光和非光谱光进行了测试。四名观察者通过对色调和饱和度进行标度来描述光的颜色。这些光的波长范围为440至640纳米,包含五种纯度:1.0、0.80、0.60、0.40和0.20。单色光与氙气白光的混合产生了不同的色度纯度。对于每个受试者,通过在每种纯度下的色调消除法测量色度响应函数,并通过对光谱光的异色闪烁光度法测量消色差响应函数。针对特定纯度测量的色度响应函数和消色差响应函数用于预测该纯度下的色调和饱和度。该模型成功预测了每种纯度水平下的色调,但未能精确预测阿布尼效应。该模型对饱和度的预测相对较差,倾向于高估短波光线并低估长波光线。另一项实验发现,有利于视杆细胞贡献的刺激参数会削弱该模型对饱和度的预测,而不利于视杆细胞贡献的刺激参数则会改善该模型对饱和度的预测。