Suppr超能文献

心脏外科手术中使用的两种皮肤准备方法的比较。

A comparison of two skin preps used in cardiac surgical procedures.

作者信息

Hagen K S, Treston-Aurand J

机构信息

St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.

出版信息

AORN J. 1995 Sep;62(3):393-402. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)63580-1.

Abstract

Postoperative surgical site infections contribute significantly to increased patient morbidity and mortality rates and unnecessary hospital costs. Effective and efficient preoperative patient skin preparation is an important perioperative nursing intervention that decreases the number of wound contaminants and reduces the risks for postoperative surgical site infections. This study examined the effectiveness and time and material costs of two preoperative patient skin prep methods (ie, isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor-impregnated adhesive drape method, iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method). The isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor-impregnated adhesive drape method clinically was as effective as the iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method, more cost-effective when time and materials were compared, and less cost-effective when materials alone were compared. To make appropriate decisions about the use of preoperative patient skin prep methods, perioperative nurse managers and staff members need to examine and determine whether costs in time or materials have the greater impact on their surgical settings.

摘要

术后手术部位感染会显著导致患者发病率和死亡率上升以及产生不必要的医院费用。有效且高效的术前患者皮肤准备是一项重要的围手术期护理干预措施,可减少伤口污染物数量并降低术后手术部位感染的风险。本研究考察了两种术前患者皮肤准备方法(即异丙醇擦拭/碘伏浸渍粘性手术巾法、碘伏擦洗和涂抹/普通粘性手术巾法)的有效性、时间和材料成本。异丙醇擦拭/碘伏浸渍粘性手术巾法在临床上与碘伏擦洗和涂抹/普通粘性手术巾法一样有效,在比较时间和材料时更具成本效益,而仅比较材料时成本效益较低。为了就术前患者皮肤准备方法的使用做出恰当决策,围手术期护士管理人员和工作人员需要审视并确定时间成本或材料成本对其手术环境的影响更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验