Suppr超能文献

手术期间使用塑料粘贴巾预防手术部位感染。

Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection.

作者信息

Webster J, Alghamdi A A

机构信息

Royal Brisbane and Royal Women's Hospital, Centre for Clinical Nursing, Level 2, Building 34, Butterfield Street, Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006353. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006353.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection has been estimated to occur in about 15% of clean surgery and 30% of contaminated surgery. Using plastic adhesive drapes to protect the wound from organisms that may be present on the surrounding skin during surgery is one strategy used to prevent surgical site infection. Results from non-randomised studies have produced conflicting results about the efficacy of this approach but no systematic review has been conducted to date to guide clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of adhesive drapes used during surgery on surgical site infection, cost, mortality and morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (last searched 24/4/07), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2,2007), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to April Week 2, 2007), Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2007 Week 16), and Ovid CINAHL (1982 to 1980 to April Week 2 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing any plastic adhesive drape with no adhesive drape, used alone or in combination with woven (material) drapes or disposable (paper) drapes in patients undergoing any type of surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected and assessed studies for trial quality and both independently extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes five studies involving 3,082 participants comparing adhesive drapes with no drape and two studies involving 1,113 participants comparing iodine-impregnated adhesive drapes with no drape. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the adhesive drape group developed a surgical site infection when compared with no drape. (Relative Risk (RR) 1.23, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.02 to 1.48, p=0.03). Iodine-impregnated adhesive drapes had no effect on the surgical site infection rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.064 to 1.66, p=0.89). Length of hospital stay was similar in adhesive drape and non-adhesive drape groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence from the seven trials that plastic adhesive drapes reduces surgical site infection rate and some evidence that they increase infection rates. Further trials may be justified using blinded outcome assessment to examine the effect of adhesive drapes on surgical site infection based on different wound classifications.

摘要

背景

据估计,清洁手术的手术部位感染发生率约为15%,污染手术的发生率约为30%。使用塑料粘贴手术巾来保护伤口,使其在手术期间免受周围皮肤上可能存在的微生物污染,是预防手术部位感染的一种策略。非随机研究的结果对于这种方法的疗效产生了相互矛盾的结果,但迄今为止尚未进行系统评价以指导临床实践。

目的

评估手术中使用粘贴手术巾对手术部位感染、成本、死亡率和发病率的影响。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库(最后检索时间为2007年4月24日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2007年第2期)、Ovid MEDLINE(1950年至2007年4月第2周)、Ovid EMBASE(1980年至2007年第16周)以及Ovid CINAHL(1982年至2007年4月第2周)。

选择标准

随机对照试验,比较在接受任何类型手术的患者中,单独使用或与织物(材料)手术巾或一次性(纸质)手术巾联合使用的任何塑料粘贴手术巾与不使用粘贴手术巾的情况。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立选择并评估研究的试验质量,且均独立提取数据。与研究作者联系以获取更多信息。

主要结果

本综述纳入了五项涉及3082名参与者的研究,比较了粘贴手术巾与不使用手术巾的情况;以及两项涉及1113名参与者的研究,比较了含碘粘贴手术巾与不使用手术巾的情况。与不使用手术巾相比,粘贴手术巾组发生手术部位感染的患者比例显著更高。(相对危险度(RR)1.23,95%置信区间(CI)1.02至1.48,p = 0.03)。含碘粘贴手术巾对手术部位感染率无影响(RR 1.03,95%CI 0.064至1.66,p = 0.89)。粘贴手术巾组和非粘贴手术巾组的住院时间相似。

作者结论

七项试验中没有证据表明塑料粘贴手术巾可降低手术部位感染率,且有一些证据表明它们会增加感染率。基于不同的伤口分类,使用盲法结局评估来研究粘贴手术巾对手术部位感染的影响,可能有必要进行进一步试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验