Suppr超能文献

来自尼德克3-Dx和蔡司视网膜相机的立体视盘照片的比较。

Comparison of stereo optic disc photographs from the Nidek 3-Dx and Zeiss retinal cameras.

作者信息

Barry C J, Eikelboom R H

机构信息

Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Nedlands.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995 Aug;23(3):203-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1995.tb00157.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Zeiss retinal camera with the Nidek 3-Dx camera for photographic quality and stereo separation.

SUBJECTS

Eleven subjects (22 eyes) were selected from patients referred for optic disc photography.

METHODS

The subjects were photographed using the Nidek 3-Dx camera for simultaneous stereo photographs, and the 30 degrees field and 15 degrees field settings on the Zeiss retinal camera for sequential stereo photographs. Four ophthalmologists qualitatively scored the photographs on a five-point scale for stereo separation and photographic resolution and sharpness. The results from the four observers were averaged and the Friedman two-way analysis of variance used to analyse the results.

CONCLUSIONS

It was found that the stereo separation is significantly better using the Nidek camera when compared with both the 30 degrees and 15 degrees Zeiss results. There was no significant difference in photographic quality between the Nidek and Zeiss 30 degrees photographs. It was also found that the Zeiss 30 degrees images had a significantly higher quality than the Zeiss 15 degrees, which contradicted previous results.

摘要

目的

比较蔡司视网膜相机和尼德克3-Dx相机的摄影质量及立体分离效果。

受试者

从因视盘摄影而转诊的患者中选取11名受试者(22只眼)。

方法

使用尼德克3-Dx相机为受试者拍摄同步立体照片,使用蔡司视网膜相机的30度视野和15度视野设置拍摄连续立体照片。四名眼科医生对照片的立体分离效果、摄影分辨率和清晰度进行五分制定性评分。将四名观察者的结果进行平均,并采用弗里德曼双向方差分析来分析结果。

结论

结果发现,与蔡司相机30度和15度视野的结果相比,使用尼德克相机时立体分离效果明显更好。尼德克相机和蔡司相机30度视野照片的摄影质量没有显著差异。还发现蔡司相机30度视野的图像质量明显高于15度视野的,这与之前的结果相矛盾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验