Suppr超能文献

酮咯酸用于术后早期镇痛。

Ketorolac for early postoperative analgesia.

作者信息

Parke T J, Millett S, Old S, Goodwin A P, Rice A S

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, U.K.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1995 Sep;7(6):465-9. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00054-l.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and speed of onset of analgesia of a single dose of intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) ketorolac tromethamine following major orthopedic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

A district general hospital in England.

PATIENTS

112 patients aged 18 to 80 years suffering moderate or severe pain following orthopedic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive 30 mg ketorolac IV, 30 mg ketorolac IM, or placebo following surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Verbal pain intensity scores were performed prior to admission to the study, then frequently for the first 45 minutes following administration of study medication, and subsequently at hourly intervals. Times to request for further analgesia were noted. Patient assessment of overall acceptability and pain relief of the study medication was recorded. There was no statistical difference in speed of onset of analgesia between the ketorolac groups and placebo. Median (range) times to first analgesic following study drugs were: ketorolac IV 45 minutes (9 to 1440 minutes), ketorolac IM 34 minutes (10 to 1440 minutes), placebo 24 minutes (10 to 615 minutes). There was a statistically significant difference between the ketorolac groups and placebo (ketorolac IV vs. placebo, p < 0.01; ketorolac IM vs. placebo, p = 0.03). Patient assessment of overall acceptability and pain relief was significantly better for IV ketorolac compared with placebo (p < 0.01). By 6 hours, 78% of the IV ketorolac group and 95% of the IM ketorolac and placebo groups required further analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high patient acceptability compared with placebo, the use of ketorolac as the sole analgesic failed to control postoperative pain following major orthopedic surgery. IV administration of ketorolac conferred no advantages over the IM route with regard to efficacy or speed of onset.

摘要

研究目的

确定大手术后单剂量静脉注射(IV)或肌肉注射(IM)酮咯酸氨丁三醇的镇痛效果及起效速度。

研究设计

双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

研究地点

英国一家地区综合医院。

患者

112名年龄在18至80岁之间、骨科手术后遭受中度或重度疼痛的患者。

干预措施

患者在术后被随机分配接受30毫克静脉注射酮咯酸、30毫克肌肉注射酮咯酸或安慰剂。

测量指标及主要结果

在进入研究前进行言语疼痛强度评分,然后在给予研究药物后的前45分钟内频繁进行评分,随后每隔一小时进行一次评分。记录要求进一步镇痛的时间。记录患者对研究药物总体可接受性和疼痛缓解情况的评估。酮咯酸组和安慰剂组在镇痛起效速度上无统计学差异。研究药物后首次镇痛的中位(范围)时间为:静脉注射酮咯酸45分钟(9至1440分钟),肌肉注射酮咯酸34分钟(10至1440分钟),安慰剂24分钟(10至615分钟)。酮咯酸组与安慰剂组之间存在统计学显著差异(静脉注射酮咯酸与安慰剂相比,p < 0.01;肌肉注射酮咯酸与安慰剂相比,p = 0.03)。与安慰剂相比,患者对静脉注射酮咯酸的总体可接受性和疼痛缓解情况的评估明显更好(p < 0.01)。到6小时时,静脉注射酮咯酸组的78%以及肌肉注射酮咯酸组和安慰剂组的95%需要进一步镇痛。

结论

尽管与安慰剂相比患者接受度较高,但使用酮咯酸作为单一镇痛药未能控制大骨科手术后的术后疼痛。在疗效或起效速度方面,静脉注射酮咯酸与肌肉注射途径相比没有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验