Paulus H E
University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;34 Suppl 2:92-5.
Because the differences in efficacy between a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) combination and its constituent drugs are likely to be smaller than those between placebo and the single DMARDs, it has been difficult to prove that any combination of DMARDs has either additive or synergistic benefit. The discriminatory power of the study design can be enhanced by careful attention to the details of patient selection, study design and duration, and choices of primary outcome measures and analytical methods. Use of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 'core set' of outcome measures and the proposed ACR 'definition of improvement' for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials, with intent-to-treat analysis, in a balanced, prospective, double-blind randomized clinical trial of 1-2 yr duration will optimize the chances of discriminating between the clinical benefit of the combination and its components if a real difference is present.
由于改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)联合用药与单一成分药物之间疗效的差异可能小于安慰剂与单一DMARD之间的差异,因此很难证明任何DMARD联合用药具有相加或协同效应。通过仔细关注患者选择、研究设计和持续时间以及主要结局指标和分析方法的选择等细节,可以提高研究设计的辨别力。在为期1至2年的平衡、前瞻性、双盲随机临床试验中,采用美国风湿病学会(ACR)的结局指标“核心集”以及拟议的ACR类风湿关节炎(RA)临床试验“改善定义”并进行意向性分析,如果确实存在差异,将优化区分联合用药及其成分临床获益的机会。