• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科分诊伦理:学术急诊医学协会立场声明。学术急诊医学协会伦理委员会

Ethics of emergency department triage: SAEM position statement. SAEM Ethics Committee (Society for Academic Emergency Medicine).

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;2(11):990-5.

PMID:8536127
Abstract

Emergency department overcrowding, the growth of managed care, and the high cost of emergency care are creating pressures to triage patients away from U.S. EDs. Paradoxically, this pressure to limit patient access to EDs has increased in spite of federal laws that restrict patient triage and transfer. The latter regulations view EDs as the safety net for the U.S. health care system. The SAEM Ethics Committee evaluated the ethical implications of policies that triage patients out of the ED prior to complete evaluation and treatment. The committee used these implications to develop practical guidelines, which are reported.

摘要

急诊科人满为患、管理式医疗的发展以及急诊护理的高昂成本,正促使人们对美国急诊科的患者进行分流。矛盾的是,尽管有联邦法律限制患者分流和转诊,但限制患者进入急诊科的压力却在增加。后一项规定将急诊科视为美国医疗系统的安全网。美国急诊医学学会伦理委员会评估了在患者完成评估和治疗之前将其从急诊科分流的政策所带来的伦理影响。委员会利用这些影响制定了实用指南,并予以报告。

相似文献

1
Ethics of emergency department triage: SAEM position statement. SAEM Ethics Committee (Society for Academic Emergency Medicine).急诊科分诊伦理:学术急诊医学协会立场声明。学术急诊医学协会伦理委员会
Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;2(11):990-5.
2
Assessing values: rationing emergency department care.评估价值:急诊护理的资源分配
Am J Emerg Med. 1992 May;10(3):263-4. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(92)90224-L.
3
Triage: from government to institutions.分诊:从政府到机构。
Mt Sinai J Med. 1984 Jan-Feb;51(1):101-3.
4
Triage: from departments to patients.分诊:从科室到患者。
Mt Sinai J Med. 1984 Jan-Feb;51(1):110-2.
5
Impact of a triage liaison physician on emergency department overcrowding and throughput: a randomized controlled trial.分诊联络医师对急诊科拥挤状况及诊疗效率的影响:一项随机对照试验
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;14(8):702-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.04.018.
6
Lifestyle choices and medical technology: allocating organ transplants.生活方式的选择与医疗技术:器官移植的分配
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1991 Winter;13(3):260-83.
7
Regulating the business of medicine: models for integrating ethics and managed care.规范医疗行业:整合伦理与管理式医疗的模式
Columbia J Law Soc Probl. 1997;30(4):635-84.
8
Conflicts between managed care organizations and emergency departments in California.加利福尼亚州管理式医疗组织与急诊科之间的冲突。
West J Med. 1996 Feb;164(2):137-42.
9
The ethics of research without consent in emergency situations.紧急情况下未经同意进行研究的伦理问题。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2005 Jul;72(4):242-9.
10
Interests, obligations, and justice: some notes toward an ethic of managed care.利益、义务与公正:关于管理式医疗伦理的几点笔记
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):312-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Age in addition to RETTS triage priority substantially improves 3-day mortality prediction in emergency department patients: a multi-center cohort study.年龄除了 RETTS 分诊优先级之外,还能显著提高急诊科患者 3 天死亡率的预测:一项多中心队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 18;31(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01123-8.
2
When do caregivers ignore the veil of ignorance? An empirical study on medical triage decision-making.当照顾者忽视无知之幕时会怎样?一项关于医疗分诊决策的实证研究。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Jun;24(2):213-225. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09992-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Emergency department triage: an ethical analysis.
急诊分诊:伦理分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 7;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-16.