• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童急性中耳炎:潜在病原体的鼻咽部携带情况及头孢克肟与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗效果的研究

Acute otitis media in children: a study of nasopharyngeal carriage of potential pathogens and therapeutic efficacy of cefixime and amoxicillin-clavulanate.

作者信息

Boulesteix J, Bégué P, Dubreuil C, Mégraud F, Dabernat H, Geslin P, de La Rocque F, Trinh A

机构信息

Service de Pédiatrie II, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Limoges.

出版信息

Infection. 1995;23 Suppl 2:S79-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01742989.

DOI:10.1007/BF01742989
PMID:8537137
Abstract

We conducted a large, multicenter, randomized, open-label study throughout France comparing the efficacy and safety of cefixime suspension (8 mg/kg/day, b.i.d., for 10 days) versus amoxicillin-clavulanate suspension (80 mg/kg/day, t.i.d., for 10 days) in 510 children (ages 6 to 36 months) with acute otitis media. The most frequent microorganisms colonizing the nasopharynx at the start of treatment were Streptococcus pneumoniae (51.5%), Haemophilus influenzae (45%) and Moraxella catarrhalis (30.2%). Rates of beta-lactamase positivity were 32.1% and 95.3% for H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, respectively. Decreased susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to penicillin was found in 39.7% of isolates. Clinical efficacy was 87.8% (223/254) for cefixime and 87.0% (215/247) for amoxicillin-clavulanate. At the 5-week follow-up visit, relapse had occurred in 15.7% (31/197) of cefixime-treated patients and in 15.6% (32/205) of those treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate. We conclude that these two regimens are equally effective in acute otitis media in children.

摘要

我们在法国全境开展了一项大型、多中心、随机、开放标签研究,比较头孢克肟混悬液(8毫克/千克/天,每日两次,共10天)与阿莫西林-克拉维酸混悬液(80毫克/千克/天,每日三次,共10天)对510名(6至36个月大)急性中耳炎儿童的疗效和安全性。治疗开始时,在鼻咽部定植的最常见微生物是肺炎链球菌(51.5%)、流感嗜血杆菌(45%)和卡他莫拉菌(30.2%)。流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌的β-内酰胺酶阳性率分别为32.1%和95.3%。在39.7%的分离株中发现肺炎链球菌对青霉素的敏感性降低。头孢克肟的临床疗效为87.8%(223/254),阿莫西林-克拉维酸为87.0%(215/247)。在5周的随访中,头孢克肟治疗的患者中有15.7%(31/197)复发,阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗的患者中有15.6%(32/205)复发。我们得出结论,这两种治疗方案对儿童急性中耳炎同样有效。

相似文献

1
Acute otitis media in children: a study of nasopharyngeal carriage of potential pathogens and therapeutic efficacy of cefixime and amoxicillin-clavulanate.儿童急性中耳炎:潜在病原体的鼻咽部携带情况及头孢克肟与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗效果的研究
Infection. 1995;23 Suppl 2:S79-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01742989.
2
Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media.多位研究者对头孢丙烯、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢克肟和头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性进行的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):857-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02111353.
3
Comparison of the efficacy, safety and acceptability of cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute otitis media.头孢克肟与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性中耳炎的疗效、安全性及可接受性比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Feb;16(2 Suppl):S21-4. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199702001-00006.
4
Comparison of cefprozil with other antibiotic regimens in the treatment of children with acute otitis media.头孢丙烯与其他抗生素治疗方案在儿童急性中耳炎治疗中的比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;14 Suppl 2:S204-8; discussion S209-11. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.supplement_2.s204.
5
Bacteriology of acute otitis media: a new perspective.急性中耳炎的细菌学:一个新视角。
J Pediatr. 1992 Jan;120(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80605-5.
6
Effects of cefixime or co-amoxiclav treatment on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in children with acute otitis media.头孢克肟或阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗对急性中耳炎患儿肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌鼻咽部携带情况的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Feb;41(2):253-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/41.2.253.
7
Evaluation of amoxicillin clavulanate twice daily versus thrice daily in the treatment of otitis media in children. Danish-Swedish Study Group.儿童中耳炎治疗中阿莫西林克拉维酸盐每日两次与每日三次的疗效评估。丹麦-瑞典研究小组。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 May;12(5):319-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01964426.
8
Cefixime compared with amoxicillin for treatment of acute otitis media.
J Pediatr. 1991 Jul;119(1 Pt 1):117-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81051-0.
9
A multicenter, open label trial of azithromycin vs. amoxicillin/ clavulanate for the management of acute otitis media in children.一项比较阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的多中心开放标签试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S15-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00003.
10
Bacteriologic failure of amoxicillin-clavulanate in treatment of acute otitis media caused by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae.阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗由非分型流感嗜血杆菌引起的急性中耳炎时的细菌学失败
J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):799-806. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70415-9.

本文引用的文献

1
On classifying otitis media as suppurative or nonsuppurative, with a suggested clinical schema.
J Pediatr. 1987 Dec;111(6 Pt 1):948-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80226-3.