Suppr超能文献

评估带或不带骨移植的胶原膜治疗牙周骨内缺损的效果。

Evaluation of a collagen membrane with and without bone grafts in treating periodontal intrabony defects.

作者信息

Chen C C, Wang H L, Smith F, Glickman G N, Shyr Y, O'Neal R B

机构信息

Department of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1995 Oct;66(10):838-47. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.10.838.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical regenerative capacity of collagen membrane with and without demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) in treating periodontal intrabony defects. Ten systemically healthy patients with similar bilateral periodontal defects were scheduled for surgery. Each patient had at least > or = 6 mm clinical probing depth and loss of attachment at selected sites. Baseline measurements included gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and mobility. At the time of surgery, the defects were randomly assigned to either test (collagen membrane plus DFDBA) or control group (collagen membrane only). Stent to base of the defects, stent to crest bone, crest of bone to base of the defect, and width of the defects were recorded at the time of surgery and reentry. Eight patients returned after 6 months for reentry surgery. Statistical analysis with a paired t test was used to evaluate the treatment effect and comparison between test and control groups. In addition, a McNemar test was used to analyze the significance of GI, PI, and mobility at different times. The result of this study indicated that both the collagen plus DFDBA and the collagen alone treatment groups had a significant decrease of PD (3.4 +/- 0.4 and 3.2 +/- 0.4 mm), gain of CAL (2.3 +/- 0.5 and 2.0 +/- 0.4 mm), and defect fill (1.7 +/- 0.3 and 1.9 +/- 0.9 mm) (P < 0.05) when compared to the presurgery status. However, there was no significant difference in PD, AL, GR, defect fill, crestal bone resorption, GI, PI, or mobility between the test group and control group. No adverse tissue reaction, infection, or delayed wound healing was noted throughout the treatment in either group. This study suggests that the collagen membrane is well tolerated by the human tissues. Both treatments, either collagen membrane plus DFDBA or collagen membrane alone, promoted significant resolution of periodontal intrabony defects. The addition of a bone graft (DFDBA) with a collagen membrane appears to add no extra benefit to the collagen membrane treatment.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较有和没有脱矿冻干异体骨(DFDBA)的胶原膜在治疗牙周骨内缺损时的临床再生能力。10名全身健康且有相似双侧牙周缺损的患者被安排接受手术。每位患者在选定部位至少有≥6mm的临床探诊深度和附着丧失。基线测量包括牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈退缩(GR)、临床附着水平(CAL)、探诊深度(PD)和松动度。手术时,将缺损随机分配到试验组(胶原膜加DFDBA)或对照组(仅胶原膜)。在手术和再次手术时记录缺损底部至支架、嵴骨至支架、嵴骨至缺损底部的距离以及缺损宽度。8名患者在6个月后返回接受再次手术。采用配对t检验进行统计分析,以评估治疗效果以及试验组和对照组之间的比较。此外,采用McNemar检验分析不同时间GI、PI和松动度的显著性。本研究结果表明,与术前状态相比,胶原加DFDBA治疗组和单纯胶原治疗组的PD均显著降低(分别为3.4±0.4和3.2±0.4mm),CAL均增加(分别为2.3±0.5和2.0±0.4mm),缺损填充均增加(分别为1.7±0.3和1.9±0.9mm)(P<0.05)。然而,试验组和对照组在PD、AL、GR、缺损填充、嵴骨吸收、GI、PI或松动度方面没有显著差异。在整个治疗过程中,两组均未观察到不良组织反应、感染或伤口愈合延迟。本研究表明,人体组织对胶原膜耐受性良好。胶原膜加DFDBA或单纯胶原膜这两种治疗方法均能显著改善牙周骨内缺损。在胶原膜治疗中添加骨移植(DFDBA)似乎并未带来额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验