Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 1996 Jan;71(1):43-52. doi: 10.4065/71.1.43.
To describe the various types of stress tests and to provide guidelines for selecting a specific test for an individual patient.
Myocardial perfusion imaging, radionuclide angiography, stress echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing are described. The advantages and limitations of these techniques are reviewed and compared with those of standard treadmill exercise testing. The agents used for pharmacologic stress testing are discussed.
Standard treadmill exercise testing is widely available and is less expensive than the imaging techniques. It is most accurate in patients with normal findings on a resting electrocardiogram who are not taking digoxin. In these patients, standard exercise electrocardiography is almost as accurate as the exercise imaging modalities for identifying those with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease. Advantages of the stress imaging modalities in comparison with standard exercise electrocardiography include greater accuracy when the resting electrocardiogram shows abnormal findings, higher sensitivity, ability to localize and characterize the extent of myocardial ischemia, and direct measurement of other variables such as left ventricular function. These techniques must be performed carefully in experienced laboratories in order to provide accurate information. Published data are scant that directly compare one technique with another in the same set of patients. The nuclear cardiology techniques have been well validated for detecting left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease and for assessing prognosis. Myocardial perfusion imaging has been well validated for detecting ischemia in patients with abnormal left ventricular function at rest. In comparison with the nuclear cardiology techniques, stress echocardiography is less expensive and provides more ancillary information but has not been as well validated for assessment of severe coronary artery disease or prognosis. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can be useful in selecting patients for cardiac transplantation and in assessing exertional dyspnea in selected patients. The most common application of pharmacologic stress testing is preoperative risk assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac operations. Pharmacologic stress testing should usually be reversed for patients who are unable to exercise adequately.
Most patients with normal findings on a resting electrocardiogram who are not taking digoxin should undergo standard treadmill exercise testing for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Most patients with abnormal findings on a resting electrocardiogram should undergo one of the stress imaging techniques. Selecting a specific stress imaging techniques. should depend primarily on local expertise with the various techniques and secondarily on the strengths and limitations of the techniques as they relate to the individual patient.
描述各种类型的负荷试验,并为针对个体患者选择特定试验提供指导原则。
介绍了心肌灌注成像、放射性核素血管造影、负荷超声心动图和心肺运动试验。回顾了这些技术的优缺点,并与标准平板运动试验进行比较。讨论了用于药物负荷试验的药物。
标准平板运动试验广泛可用,且比成像技术成本更低。对于静息心电图正常且未服用地高辛的患者,其最为准确。在这些患者中,标准运动心电图在识别左主干或三支冠状动脉疾病患者方面几乎与运动成像方法一样准确。与标准运动心电图相比,负荷成像方法的优点包括静息心电图显示异常时准确性更高、敏感性更高、能够定位和描述心肌缺血范围以及直接测量其他变量如左心室功能。这些技术必须在经验丰富的实验室中仔细进行,以提供准确信息。在同一组患者中直接比较一种技术与另一种技术的已发表数据很少。核心脏病学技术在检测左主干和三支冠状动脉疾病以及评估预后方面已得到充分验证。心肌灌注成像在检测静息时左心室功能异常患者的缺血方面已得到充分验证。与核心脏病学技术相比,负荷超声心动图成本更低且能提供更多辅助信息,但在评估严重冠状动脉疾病或预后方面尚未得到充分验证。心肺运动试验在选择心脏移植患者和评估特定患者的运动性呼吸困难方面可能有用。药物负荷试验最常见的应用是对接受非心脏手术的患者进行术前风险评估。对于无法充分运动的患者,药物负荷试验通常应进行逆转。
大多数静息心电图正常且未服用地高辛的患者应进行标准平板运动试验以用于诊断和预后评估。大多数静息心电图异常的患者应进行负荷成像技术之一。选择特定的负荷成像技术应主要取决于当地对各种技术的专业知识,其次取决于这些技术与个体患者相关的优缺点。