Cooney D O
Chemical Engineering Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82070, USA.
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1995 Aug;37(4):371-7.
The current USP adsorption tests for activated charcoals, involving methylene blue (MB) and strychnine sulfate (SS), were conducted for 6 activated charcoals having surface areas ranging from 600 to 2000 m2/g. The MB test is relatively complex and tedious, and uses a pass/fail criterion which is of such small magnitude that substantial uncertainties are likely. The SS test is only qualitative. Modification, using quantification of the turbidities, permitted quantitative interpretation. The test was failed by 2 charcoals of surface area 660 m2/g or less, and was passed by 4 charcoals of 720 m2/g surface area or higher. Neither test was able to reflect the substantial drug adsorption differences which exist for charcoals of average, above average, and high surface areas. Alternative tests for MB and SS were developed and evaluated using 6 charcoals. These tests, which are proposed for consideration by the US Pharmacopeial Convention, are simpler and faster than the current tests and yield precise values for the percentages of the 2 compounds adsorbed. Moreover, they clearly reflect the wide differences in adsorption performance of charcoals having widely different surface areas. Minimum percent adsorption values that must be attained for a charcoal to qualify as "USP grade" are proposed for both alternative tests (these would not exclude any current USP grade charcoal). Performance classifications of charcoals into categories of Low, Average, Above Average, and High are also proposed for both tests. These are shown to correspond to surface area ranges of < 700, 700-950, 950-1200, and > 1200 m2/g, respectively.
目前针对活性炭的美国药典吸附试验,涉及亚甲蓝(MB)和硫酸士的宁(SS),对6种比表面积在600至2000平方米/克之间的活性炭进行了测试。MB试验相对复杂且繁琐,采用的通过/失败标准数值极小,很可能存在较大不确定性。SS试验仅为定性试验。通过对浊度进行量化的改进,实现了定量解释。比表面积为660平方米/克及以下的2种活性炭未通过该试验,比表面积为720平方米/克及以上的4种活性炭通过了该试验。两种试验均无法反映平均、高于平均和高比表面积活性炭之间存在的显著药物吸附差异。使用6种活性炭开发并评估了MB和SS的替代试验。这些试验提交给美国药典委员会审议,比现行试验更简单、更快,且能得出两种化合物吸附百分比的精确值。此外,它们清楚地反映了比表面积差异很大的活性炭在吸附性能上的巨大差异。针对两种替代试验,均提出了活性炭要符合“美国药典级”必须达到的最低吸附百分比值(这些值不会排除任何现行美国药典级活性炭)。两种试验还都提出了将活性炭分为低、平均、高于平均和高四类的性能分类。结果表明,这些分类分别对应比表面积范围<700、700 - 950、950 - 1200和>1200平方米/克。