Mnatsakanian E V, Dorokhov V B
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 1995 Jul-Aug;45(4):676-85.
Subjects were instructed to modify their N100-P200 component of VEP (in Cz recording) within selected time window. The aim was to increase the number of VEPs for which the amplitude of segment in question exceeded the definite threshold. The success in task performance suggests several modifications of the to-be-conditioned segment through different mechanisms. Of our 26 subjects, 14 were able to modify their VEPs according to the task demands. However, the latter subjects could be divided into 2 groups on the basis of the rate of increase in the number of correct responses under conditioning. Subjects which did not succeed in task performance could be also classed into 2 groups: one group with statistically negligible changes and the other decreasing the number of correct responses. ANOVA has shown significant distinctions in task performance for the groups with different levels of self-estimation of tiredness after experiment and different personal strategies. The success in task performance is likely to be dependent on the values of Eysenck questionnaire scales and topography of alpha activity.
受试者被指示在选定的时间窗口内修改其视觉诱发电位(VEP)的N100 - P200成分(在Cz记录点)。目的是增加在所讨论节段的幅度超过确定阈值的VEP数量。任务执行的成功表明通过不同机制对要条件化的节段进行了几种修改。在我们的26名受试者中,有14名能够根据任务要求修改他们的VEP。然而,后一组受试者可以根据条件作用下正确反应数量的增加率分为两组。任务执行未成功的受试者也可以分为两组:一组变化在统计学上可忽略不计,另一组正确反应数量减少。方差分析表明,实验后疲劳自我评估水平不同以及个人策略不同的组在任务执行方面存在显著差异。任务执行的成功可能取决于艾森克问卷量表的值和α活动的地形图。