Greenberg H M, Dwyer E M, Hochman J S, Steinberg J S, Echt D S, Peters R W
Division of Cardiology, St Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY 10019, USA.
Br Heart J. 1995 Dec;74(6):631-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.6.631.
To determine whether an interaction between encainide or flecainide and intercurrent ischaemia could account for the observed increase in cardiac and sudden deaths in the study group in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) I.
CAST I was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study in which patients received the drug which suppressed at least 6 premature ventricular contractions per minute by 80% or episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia by 90%. Arrhythmic sudden death or aborted sudden death were the study end points. Measured secondary end points included recurrent myocardial infarction, new or increasing angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, and syncope. The CAST I database was analysed to determine which of three end points occurred first--cardiac death or cardiac arrest, angina pectoris, or non-fatal recurrent infarction. They were regarded as mutually exclusive end points. The triad of cardiac or sudden arrhythmic death plus congestive heart failure and syncope was similarly analysed.
It was assumed that recurrent non-fatal infarction and new or increasing angina pectoris were ischaemic in origin. The sum of these non-fatal ischaemic end points and sudden death were nearly identical in the placebo group (N = 129) and the treatment group (N = 131). The one year event rate in each group was 21%. However, the treatment group had a much greater fatality rate (55 v 17; P < 0.0001) than the placebo group. The same relation was found when the data were examined on the basis of drug exposure rather than intention to treat. The temporal and circadian events were similar in each group and were consistent with an ischaemic pattern. No such patterns emerged from analysis of the presumed non-ischaemic end points of congestive heart failure and syncope.
These data suggest that the interaction between active ischaemia and treatment with encainide or flecainide may have been responsible for the increased mortality seen in the treatment group in CAST I. This conversion of a non-fatal to a fatal event emphasises the need for future antiarrhythmic drugs to be screened in ischaemic models.
确定恩卡尼或氟卡尼与并发缺血之间的相互作用是否可解释心律失常抑制试验(CAST)I研究组中心脏性死亡和猝死增加的现象。
CAST I是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,患者接受能将每分钟至少6次室性早搏抑制80%或非持续性室性心动过速发作抑制90%的药物。心律失常性猝死或猝死未遂为研究终点。测量的次要终点包括复发性心肌梗死、新发或加重的心绞痛、充血性心力衰竭和晕厥。对CAST I数据库进行分析,以确定三个终点中哪一个最先出现——心脏性死亡或心脏骤停、心绞痛或非致命性复发性梗死。它们被视为相互排斥的终点。对心脏性或心律失常性猝死加充血性心力衰竭和晕厥这一组情况进行了类似分析。
假定复发性非致命性梗死和新发或加重的心绞痛源于缺血。这些非致命性缺血终点和猝死的总和在安慰剂组(N = 129)和治疗组(N = 131)中几乎相同。每组的一年事件发生率为21%。然而,治疗组的死亡率(55比17;P < 0.0001)远高于安慰剂组。根据药物暴露而非意向性治疗来检查数据时,发现了相同的关系。每组的时间和昼夜事件相似,且与缺血模式一致。对充血性心力衰竭和晕厥这两个假定的非缺血终点进行分析时,未出现此类模式。
这些数据表明,活动性缺血与恩卡尼或氟卡尼治疗之间的相互作用可能是CAST I治疗组中死亡率增加的原因。这种从非致命事件转变为致命事件的情况强调了未来抗心律失常药物需要在缺血模型中进行筛选的必要性。