N Engl J Med. 1989 Aug 10;321(6):406-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198908103210629.
The occurrence of ventricular premature depolarizations in survivors of myocardial infarction is a risk factor for subsequent sudden death, but whether antiarrhythmic therapy reduces the risk is not known. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) is evaluating the effect of antiarrhythmic therapy (encainide, flecainide, or moricizine) in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia (six or more ventricular premature beats per hour) after myocardial infarction. As of March 30, 1989, 2309 patients had been recruited for the initial drug-titration phase of the study: 1727 (75 percent) had initial suppression of their arrhythmia (as assessed by Holter recording) through the use of one of the three study drugs and had been randomly assigned to receive active drug or placebo. During an average of 10 months of follow-up, the patients treated with active drug had a higher rate of death from arrhythmia than the patients assigned to placebo. Encainide and flecainide accounted for the excess of deaths from arrhythmia and nonfatal cardiac arrests (33 of 730 patients taking encainide or flecainide [4.5 percent]; 9 of 725 taking placebo [1.2 percent]; relative risk, 3.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 8.5). They also accounted for the higher total mortality (56 of 730 [7.7 percent] and 22 of 725 [3.0 percent], respectively; relative risk, 2.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 4.5). Because of these results, the part of the trial involving encainide and flecainide has been discontinued. We conclude that neither encainide nor flecainide should be used in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction, even though these drugs may be effective initially in suppressing ventricular arrhythmia. Whether these results apply to other patients who might be candidates for antiarrhythmic therapy is unknown.
心肌梗死幸存者出现室性早搏是随后猝死的一个危险因素,但抗心律失常治疗是否能降低这一风险尚不清楚。心律失常抑制试验(CAST)正在评估抗心律失常治疗(恩卡尼、氟卡尼或莫雷西嗪)对心肌梗死后无症状或症状轻微的室性心律失常(每小时6次或更多室性早搏)患者的疗效。截至1989年3月30日,已有2309名患者被招募进入该研究的初始药物滴定阶段:1727名(75%)患者通过使用三种研究药物之一,其心律失常(通过动态心电图记录评估)得到了初始抑制,并被随机分配接受活性药物或安慰剂。在平均10个月的随访期间,接受活性药物治疗的患者心律失常死亡率高于分配接受安慰剂的患者。恩卡尼和氟卡尼导致了心律失常死亡和非致命性心脏骤停的超额发生率(服用恩卡尼或氟卡尼的730名患者中有33名[4.5%];服用安慰剂的725名患者中有9名[1.2%];相对风险为3.6;95%置信区间为1.7至8.5)。它们还导致了更高的总死亡率(分别为730名中的56名[7.7%]和725名中的22名[3.0%];相对风险为2.5;95%置信区间为1.6至4.5)。由于这些结果,该试验中涉及恩卡尼和氟卡尼的部分已停止。我们得出结论,恩卡尼和氟卡尼均不应用于治疗心肌梗死后无症状或症状轻微的室性心律失常患者,尽管这些药物最初可能有效地抑制室性心律失常。这些结果是否适用于其他可能是抗心律失常治疗候选者的患者尚不清楚。