Anderson J F, McEwan K L, Hrudey W P
Adult Clinical and Addictions Services Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Health, Victoria, BC.
CMAJ. 1996 Jan 1;154(1):31-9.
To compare the effectiveness of group education and notification with that of notification alone in modifying prescribing of regulated analgesics.
Randomized controlled trial conducted from Dec. 1, 1992, to Dec. 31, 1993.
Nonacademic primary care practices in British Columbia.
Fifty-four physicians randomly selected from a group of 100 physicians who had written a number of prescriptions for regulated drugs more than than two standard deviations above the mean number of prescriptions written for such drugs in 1992. Any physician who was unable to participate was replaced from the original group of 100 before the study began. Five subjects did not complete the study and were not included in the analysis.
Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: those in the first group received a written notification of excessive prescribing and attended a 1-day group-education activity, those in the second group received a written notification of excessive prescribing only and those in the third group were not subject to any intervention and were unaware that their prescribing had received special notice.
Mean number of prescriptions for regulated analgesics issued per physician in the 6 months before and the 6 months after the interventions.
Physicians in the group that attended the education intervention wrote, on average, 33% fewer prescriptions after the intervention, whereas physicians in the group that received only written notification wrote 25% fewer prescriptions, on average, after the intervention. No change in prescribing was shown in the control group. The differences in rates of prescribing of regulated analgesics between each intervention group and the control group were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The difference in the rate of prescribing between the two intervention groups was not significant.
Group education and notification of prescriber status as well as notification alone significantly reduced prescribing of regulated analgesics. Hence, feedback on a physician's prescribing pattern may be a practical and less costly alternative to direct educational intervention in moderating the prescribing of regulated analgesics. The results do not, however, imply that notification is as effective as education in improving overall patient care. A follow-up study comparing the duration of the effect of the educational intervention with that of notification alone is warranted.
比较集体教育与通知(仅通知)在改变管制类镇痛药处方开具方面的效果。
1992年12月1日至1993年12月31日进行的随机对照试验。
不列颠哥伦比亚省的非学术性初级医疗诊所。
从100名医生中随机选取54名,这些医生开具的管制类药物处方数量比1992年此类药物处方平均数量高出两个标准差以上。任何无法参与的医生在研究开始前从最初的100名医生中替换。5名受试者未完成研究,未纳入分析。
参与者被随机分为三组:第一组收到过度处方的书面通知并参加为期1天的集体教育活动;第二组仅收到过度处方的书面通知;第三组未接受任何干预,且不知道他们的处方开具情况已受到特别关注。
干预前6个月和干预后6个月每位医生开具的管制类镇痛药处方平均数。
参加教育干预组的医生在干预后平均处方量减少了33%,而仅收到书面通知组的医生在干预后平均处方量减少了25%。对照组的处方开具情况没有变化。各干预组与对照组之间管制类镇痛药处方开具率的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。两个干预组之间的处方开具率差异不显著。
集体教育、通知开处方者状态以及仅通知均显著减少了管制类镇痛药的处方开具。因此,在控制管制类镇痛药处方开具方面,反馈医生的处方模式可能是一种实用且成本较低的替代直接教育干预的方法。然而,这些结果并不意味着通知在改善整体患者护理方面与教育一样有效。有必要进行一项后续研究,比较教育干预与仅通知的效果持续时间。