Suppr超能文献

教育医生减少老年患者苯二氮䓬类药物的使用:一项随机对照试验。

Educating physicians to reduce benzodiazepine use by elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Pimlott Nicholas J G, Hux Janet E, Wilson Lynn M, Kahan Meldon, Li Cindy, Rosser Walter W

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2003 Apr 1;168(7):835-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine use by elderly patients is associated with adverse outcomes including increased risk of falls and fractures, motor vehicle accidents and cognitive impairment. Recent studies suggest that individualized feedback and education to physicians may improve drug prescribing. In this study, we evaluated an intervention to address the inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines for elderly patients.

METHODS

We identified 1624 primary care physicians who wrote at least 10 prescriptions for the target drugs in a 2-month period and randomly assigned these physicians to the intervention group or the control group. We obtained data from the Ontario Drug Benefit claims database, which covers all Ontario residents aged 65 years and over for drugs selected from a minimally restrictive formulary. Every 2 months for 6 months, confidential profiles of benzodiazepine prescription use coupled with evidence-based educational bulletins were mailed to the intervention group. The control group received feedback and educational bulletins about first-line antihypertension drug prescribing for elderly patients. Our main outcome measures were reductions in the proportion of each physician's total benzodiazepine prescriptions for long-acting agents, combinations of benzodiazepines with other psychoactive medications (including other benzodiazepines) and long-term benzodiazepine therapy.

RESULTS

After randomization, 168 physicians agreed to be in the intervention group and 206 in the control group. Their demographic and prescribing characteristics were similar. Although the proportion of long-acting benzodiazepine prescriptions decreased by 0.7% in the intervention group between the baseline period and the end of the intervention period (from 20.3%, or a mean of 29.5 prescriptions, to 19.6%, or a mean of 27.7 prescriptions) and increased by 1.1% in the control group (from 19.8%, or a mean of 26.4 prescriptions, to 20.9%, or a mean of 27.7 prescriptions) (p = 0.036), this difference was not clinically significant. There was no significant difference over the study period in either combination prescribing of benzodiazepines or in prescriptions for long-term benzodiazepine therapy.

INTERPRETATION

We did not find that a program of confidential feedback and educational material offered to Ontario primary care physicians had a clinically significant impact on their benzodiazepine prescribing.

摘要

背景

老年患者使用苯二氮䓬类药物与不良后果相关,包括跌倒和骨折风险增加、机动车事故以及认知障碍。近期研究表明,向医生提供个性化反馈和教育可能会改善药物处方。在本研究中,我们评估了一项针对老年患者不适当开具苯二氮䓬类药物处方的干预措施。

方法

我们确定了1624名在2个月内为目标药物开具至少10张处方的初级保健医生,并将这些医生随机分为干预组或对照组。我们从安大略省药物福利索赔数据库获取数据,该数据库涵盖所有65岁及以上的安大略省居民,涉及从最低限度限制的处方集选取的药物。在6个月的时间里,每2个月向干预组邮寄一次苯二氮䓬类药物处方使用的保密概况以及基于证据的教育公告。对照组收到关于老年患者一线抗高血压药物处方的反馈和教育公告。我们的主要结局指标是每位医生开具的长效苯二氮䓬类药物处方、苯二氮䓬类药物与其他精神活性药物(包括其他苯二氮䓬类药物)联合处方以及长期苯二氮䓬类药物治疗处方在其总苯二氮䓬类药物处方中所占比例的降低情况。

结果

随机分组后,168名医生同意加入干预组,206名医生加入对照组。他们的人口统计学和处方特征相似。虽然干预组在基线期至干预期结束时长效苯二氮䓬类药物处方比例下降了0.7%(从20.3%,即平均29.5张处方降至19.6%,即平均27.7张处方),而对照组增加了1.1%(从19.8%,即平均26.4张处方增至20.9%,即平均27.7张处方)(p = 0.036),但这种差异在临床上并不显著。在研究期间,苯二氮䓬类药物联合处方或长期苯二氮䓬类药物治疗处方方面均无显著差异。

解读

我们发现,向安大略省初级保健医生提供保密反馈和教育材料的项目对他们开具苯二氮䓬类药物的处方没有产生临床上显著的影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Apr;71(4):225. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7104225.
4
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
7
Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 28;194(8):E279-E296. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211416.
8
Addressing Barriers to Reducing Prescribing and Implementing Deprescribing of Sedative-Hypnotics in Primary Care.
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Apr;56(4):463-474. doi: 10.1177/10600280211033022. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
9
Deprescribing for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):3323-3332. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06089-2. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Changing prescribing behaviours with educational outreach: an overview of evidence and practice.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1735-3.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验