Twardowski Z J, Prowant B F, Pickett B, Nichols W K, Nolph K D, Khanna R
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia 65212, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Jan;27(1):99-105. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90036-0.
The swan neck presternal catheter is composed of two flexible (silicon rubber) tubes joined by a titanium connector at the time of implantation. The exit site is located in the presternal or parasternal area. The catheter located on the chest was designed to reduce the incidence of exit site infections compared with peritoneal dialysis catheters with abdominal exit sites. From August 1991 to May 1995, 24 swan neck presternal catheters have been implanted in 24 patients for the following reasons: obesity nine patients, ostomies three patients, a suprapubic catheter one patient, previous problems with abdominal catheters two patients, desire to use a bathtub five patients, need to use a whirlpool one patient, need to wear sweatpants with an elastic waistband one patient, and body image two patients. In the same period, 47 abdominal swan neck catheters were implanted in 44 patients who preferred catheters with the exit on the abdomen. Presternal catheters tended to perform better regarding exit and tunnel infections, even though they were implanted in several patients in whom regular catheters with the exit on the abdomen would be difficult or impossible to implant. Two-year survival probability of presternal catheters was 0.88 +/- 0.14 (+/- SE). Recurrent/refractory peritonitis was the only reason of catheter failure. The differences in results between presternal and abdominal catheters were statistically insignificant; only the use of antibiotics to treat exit site infection was significantly higher with abdominal catheters. Patient acceptance of the exit position was good; at least seven patients preferred presternal catheter for psychological or body image reasons. We conclude that the swan neck presternal catheters provide excellent results comparable to those achieved with swan neck abdominal catheters. The catheter seems suitable for any patient commencing peritoneal dialysis and is particularly useful in extremely obese patients (body mass index > 40 kg/m2) and those with ostomies. The catheter exit location in the chest may be preferred by some patients, both men and women, for psychological or body image reasons. No specific contraindications to the presternal catheter implantation have been identified.
天鹅颈胸骨前导管由两根柔性(硅橡胶)管组成,在植入时通过钛制连接器连接。出口部位位于胸骨前或胸骨旁区域。与具有腹部出口部位的腹膜透析导管相比,位于胸部的导管旨在降低出口部位感染的发生率。1991年8月至1995年5月,24例患者植入了24根天鹅颈胸骨前导管,原因如下:肥胖9例,造口术3例,耻骨上导管1例,既往腹部导管有问题2例,想使用浴缸5例,需要使用漩涡浴1例,需要穿弹性腰带运动裤1例,以及在意身体形象2例。同期,44例更喜欢腹部出口导管的患者植入了47根腹部天鹅颈导管。胸骨前导管在出口和隧道感染方面往往表现更好,尽管在一些患者中植入常规的腹部出口导管困难或不可能。胸骨前导管的两年生存概率为0.88±0.14(±标准误)。复发性/难治性腹膜炎是导管失败的唯一原因。胸骨前导管和腹部导管的结果差异无统计学意义;只有腹部导管使用抗生素治疗出口部位感染的情况显著更高。患者对出口位置的接受度良好;至少7例患者因心理或身体形象原因更喜欢胸骨前导管。我们得出结论,天鹅颈胸骨前导管提供的出色结果与天鹅颈腹部导管相当。该导管似乎适用于任何开始腹膜透析的患者,尤其对极度肥胖患者(体重指数>40kg/m²)和有造口术的患者有用。由于心理或身体形象原因,一些男性和女性患者可能更喜欢导管出口位于胸部。尚未确定胸骨前导管植入的具体禁忌证。