Ramirez L H, Zhao Z, Rougier P, Bognel C, Dzodic R, Vassal G, Ardouin P, Gouyette A, Munck J N
Laboratoire de Pharmacotoxicologie et Pharmacogénétique, URA, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1996;37(4):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s002800050399.
The intratumoral (i.t.) delivery of anticancer drugs aims at controlling tumor growth and thereby provides palliative treatment for liver neoplasms. Mitoxantrone is a good candidate for local or regional administration because (1) its metabolism is mainly hepatic, (2) it has a steep dose-response curve for multiple solid tumors, and (3) its fixation in tissues is sustained without vesicant effects after extravasation. We compared the tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects of mitoxantrone on hepatic VX2 tumors in rabbits treated with i.t. intraarterial hepatic (i.a.h.) or i.v. mitoxantrone, i.t. ethanol; or i.t. 0.9% NaCl and in control animals. Tumor growth rates (TGRs) were evaluated at 9 days after treatment. Myelosuppression was the limiting toxicity of i.v. mitoxantrone at 1.5 mg/kg (maximal tolerated dose, MTD), but neither i.t. nor i.a.h. administration led to hematologic toxicity at the same dose. The mitoxantrone retained in tumors after i.t. administration was seen as blue-stained areas of complete necrosis according to histologic analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters showed a significantly decreased systemic exposure to the drug after both regional treatments, although the i.a.h. route appeared to have an edge over the i.t. route. TGRs were significantly reduced after i.t. mitoxantrone (81 +/- 62%), i.a.h. mitoxantrone (337 +/- 110%), and i.t. ethanol treatments (287 +/- 117%) as compared with control values (886 +/- 223%; p < 0.01). Treatment with i.v. mitoxantrone (816 +/- 132%) had no antitumor effect, nor did NaCl injections (868 +/- 116%). Mitoxantrone given i.t. induced the highest antitumor effects, resulting in a 3.5-fold reduction in TGRs as compared with i.a.h. mitoxantrone and i.t. ethanol treatments (p < 0.02). Treatment with i.t. mitoxantrone provided efficient antitumor therapy without producing major side effects. This method should be considered as palliative treatment for nonresectable liver tumors and other localized malignancies.
抗癌药物的瘤内(i.t.)给药旨在控制肿瘤生长,从而为肝脏肿瘤提供姑息治疗。米托蒽醌是局部或区域给药的良好候选药物,原因如下:(1)其代谢主要在肝脏进行;(2)对多种实体瘤具有陡峭的剂量反应曲线;(3)其在组织中的固定持续存在,外渗后无发泡作用。我们比较了米托蒽醌对兔肝脏VX2肿瘤的耐受性、药代动力学和抗肿瘤作用,这些兔接受了瘤内、肝动脉内(i.a.h.)或静脉注射米托蒽醌、瘤内注射乙醇或瘤内注射0.9%氯化钠,并与对照动物进行比较。在治疗后9天评估肿瘤生长率(TGRs)。骨髓抑制是静脉注射1.5mg/kg米托蒽醌(最大耐受剂量,MTD)的剂量限制性毒性,但瘤内或肝动脉内给药在相同剂量下均未导致血液学毒性。根据组织学分析,瘤内给药后肿瘤中保留的米托蒽醌表现为完全坏死的蓝色染色区域。药代动力学参数显示,两种区域治疗后药物的全身暴露均显著降低,尽管肝动脉内给药途径似乎比瘤内给药途径更具优势。与对照值(886±223%;p<0.01)相比,瘤内注射米托蒽醌(81±62%)、肝动脉内注射米托蒽醌(337±110%)和瘤内注射乙醇治疗(287±117%)后TGRs显著降低。静脉注射米托蒽醌(816±132%)治疗无抗肿瘤作用,注射氯化钠(868±116%)也无抗肿瘤作用。瘤内注射米托蒽醌诱导的抗肿瘤作用最高,与肝动脉内注射米托蒽醌和瘤内注射乙醇治疗相比,TGRs降低了3.5倍(p<0.02)。瘤内注射米托蒽醌治疗提供了有效的抗肿瘤治疗,且未产生主要副作用。该方法应被视为不可切除肝肿瘤和其他局部恶性肿瘤的姑息治疗方法。