Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Perry L, Wass J, Grossman A, Besser M
Department of Endocrinology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995 Nov;43(5):545-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1995.tb02918.x.
The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome remains a major challenge in clinical endocrinology. Various screening tests are commonly used to support a biochemical diagnosis in the context of clinical suspicion. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome of a single in-patient sleeping midnight cortisol to a standard 48-hour in-patient low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) during the same admission.
A retrospective analysis was performed on 150 patients investigated in our department between the years 1970 and 1994 with a confirmed diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.
One hundred and fifty patients with a diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome were analysed: 110 with Cushing's disease; 12 with tumours with ectopic ACTH secretion; 8 with ACTH dependent Cushing's syndrome of so far undetermined origin; 17 with cortisol secreting adrenal tumours; 3 with adrenocortical nodular hyperplasia. Twenty normal volunteers and nine patients with non-endocrine conditions were also investigated as controls.
Plasma cortisol was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) in the 122 patients presenting after 1980, and by fluorimetry prior to this date.
In all the control subjects the sleeping midnight cortisol was < 50 nmol/l, below the lowest standard of the routine in-house RIA. In every patient with Cushing's syndrome the sleeping midnight cortisol was detectable with a value greater than 50 nmol/l, with a range of 70-2000 nmol/l. In contrast, in three cases, all of whom had proven Cushing's disease on histology, there was uncharacteristic complete suppression of plasma cortisol to < 50 nmol/l following the LDDST.
In this series of 150 cases, a single in-patient sleeping midnight cortisol above 50 nmol/l had a 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome, clearly different from normal subjects. In contrast, the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test had a sensitivity of 98% even when the drug was administered as an in-patient. We recommend that a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test should not be used alone for confirmation of Cushing's syndrome since it may miss 2% of cases.
库欣综合征的诊断仍是临床内分泌学中的一项重大挑战。在临床怀疑的情况下,各种筛查试验通常用于支持生化诊断。本研究的目的是比较单次住院患者午夜睡眠时皮质醇对库欣综合征的诊断敏感性与同一住院期间标准的48小时住院低剂量地塞米松抑制试验(LDDST)的诊断敏感性。
对1970年至1994年间在我科确诊为库欣综合征的150例患者进行回顾性分析。
分析了150例诊断为库欣综合征的患者:110例库欣病患者;12例异位促肾上腺皮质激素分泌肿瘤患者;8例来源不明的促肾上腺皮质激素依赖性库欣综合征患者;17例分泌皮质醇的肾上腺肿瘤患者;3例肾上腺皮质结节性增生患者。还对20名正常志愿者和9例非内分泌疾病患者进行了调查作为对照。
1980年后就诊的122例患者采用放射免疫分析法(RIA)测定血浆皮质醇,在此之前采用荧光分析法测定。
所有对照受试者午夜睡眠时皮质醇均<50 nmol/l,低于常规室内RIA的最低标准。每例库欣综合征患者午夜睡眠时皮质醇均能检测到,值大于50 nmol/l,范围为70 - 2000 nmol/l。相比之下,有3例患者,经组织学证实均为库欣病,LDDST后血浆皮质醇出现异常完全抑制至<50 nmol/l。
在这150例病例系列中,单次住院患者午夜睡眠时皮质醇高于50 nmol/l对库欣综合征的诊断敏感性为100%,与正常受试者明显不同。相比之下,低剂量地塞米松抑制试验即使作为住院患者给药,敏感性也为98%。我们建议低剂量地塞米松抑制试验不应单独用于确诊库欣综合征,因为它可能漏诊2%的病例。