Kehne J H, Baron B M, Harrison B L, McCloskey T C, Palfreyman M G, Poirot M, Salituro F G, Siegel B W, Slone A L, Van Giersbergen P L
Marion Merrell Dow Research Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45215, USA.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1995 Sep 15;284(1-2):109-18. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00375-u.
Glycine receptor antagonists have been proposed to have multiple therapeutic applications, including the treatment of stroke, epilepsy, and anxiety. The present study compared the biochemical and behavioral profiles of two strychnine-insensitive glycine receptor antagonists, MDL 100,458 (3-(benzoylmethylamino)-6-chloro-1H-indole-2- carboxylic acid) and MDL 102,288 (5,7-dichloro-1,4-dihydro-4-[[[4- [(methoxycarbonyl)amino]phenyl]sulfonyl]imino]-2-quinolinecarboxylic acid monohydrate). Both compounds potently inhibited [3H]glycine binding to rat cortical/hippocampal membranes (Ki = 136, 167 nM, respectively) without showing significant activity in 18 other receptor binding assays. In an in vitro functional assay, both compounds completely antagonized N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-stimulated cGMP accumulation in rat cerebellar slices. However, in contrast to their equipotency in the glycine receptor assay, MDL 100,458 was approximately 6-fold more potent than MDL 102,288 in the cGMP assay (IC50 values = 1.25, 7.8 microM, respectively). Behavioral tests demonstrated that MDL 102,288 and MDL 100,458 exhibited strikingly different in vivo profiles. MDL 100,458 antagonized audiogenic seizures in DBA/2J mice (ED50 = 20.8 mg/kg i.p.), whereas MDL 102,288 was without effect in the dose range tested (ED50 > 300 mg/kg i.p.). Central nervous system penetration did not appear to account for this difference. For example, MDL 102,288 was not active following direct intracerebroventricular administration (ED50 > 16 micrograms; vs. 0.78 microgram for MDL 100,458). In a test of anxiolytic activity, MDL 102,288 reduced separation-induced ultrasonic vocalizations in rat pups (ED50 = 6.3 mg/kg i.p.) whereas MDL 100,458 was only weakly active (ED50 = 80.8 mg/kg i.p.). Furthermore, the anxiolytic effect of MDL 102,288 was selective in that it occurred at doses that did not produce motoric disruption as measured by an inclined-plane test (ED50 > 160 mg/kg; therapeutic index > 25.4). In contrast, the anxiolytic activity of MDL 100,458 was non-selective in that it occurred at doses that also produced motoric disruption (ED50 = 57.7 mg/kg; therapeutic index = 0.7). Thus, two glycine receptor antagonists which have similar in vitro binding profiles as selective ligands for the strychnine-insensitive glycine receptor, demonstrate different in vitro and in vivo functional profiles. The reason for these differences is not clear, though one possibility could be that the compounds may act on different NMDA receptor subtypes. These data support the possibility that different glycine receptor antagonists may have different therapeutic targets.
甘氨酸受体拮抗剂已被提出具有多种治疗应用,包括治疗中风、癫痫和焦虑症。本研究比较了两种对士的宁不敏感的甘氨酸受体拮抗剂MDL 100,458(3-(苯甲酰甲基氨基)-6-氯-1H-吲哚-2-羧酸)和MDL 102,288(5,7-二氯-1,4-二氢-4-[[[4-[(甲氧基羰基)氨基]苯基]磺酰基]亚氨基]-2-喹啉羧酸一水合物)的生化和行为特征。两种化合物均能有效抑制[3H]甘氨酸与大鼠皮质/海马膜的结合(Ki分别为136、167 nM),而在其他18种受体结合试验中未显示出明显活性。在体外功能试验中,两种化合物均能完全拮抗N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)刺激的大鼠小脑切片中cGMP的积累。然而,与它们在甘氨酸受体试验中的等效效力相反,在cGMP试验中MDL 100,458的效力比MDL 102,288高约6倍(IC50值分别为1.25、7.8 microM)。行为测试表明,MDL 102,288和MDL 100,458在体内表现出显著不同的特征。MDL 100,458能拮抗DBA/2J小鼠的听源性癫痫发作(腹腔注射ED50 = 20.8 mg/kg),而MDL 102,288在所测试的剂量范围内无效(腹腔注射ED50 > 300 mg/kg)。中枢神经系统的渗透似乎不能解释这种差异。例如,直接脑室内给药后MDL 102,288无活性(ED50 > 16微克;而MDL 100,458为0.78微克)。在抗焦虑活性测试中,MDL 102,288减少了大鼠幼崽分离诱导的超声发声(腹腔注射ED50 = 6.3 mg/kg),而MDL 100,458活性较弱(腹腔注射ED50 = 80.8 mg/kg)。此外,MDL 102,288的抗焦虑作用具有选择性,因为它在通过斜面试验测量未产生运动障碍的剂量下出现(ED50 > 160 mg/kg;治疗指数> 25.)。相比之下,MDL 100,458的抗焦虑活性是非选择性的,因为它在也产生运动障碍的剂量下出现(ED50 = 57.7 mg/kg;治疗指数 = 0.7)。因此,两种作为对士的宁不敏感的甘氨酸受体选择性配体具有相似体外结合特征的甘氨酸受体拮抗剂,在体外和体内功能特征上表现不同。这些差异的原因尚不清楚,不过一种可能性是这些化合物可能作用于不同的NMDA受体亚型。这些数据支持了不同甘氨酸受体拮抗剂可能具有不同治疗靶点的可能性。