Neuman A C, Bakke M H, Hellman S, Levitt H
Center for Research in Speech and Hearing Sciences, Graduate School, City University of New York, USA.
Ear Hear. 1995 Aug;16(4):407-16. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199508000-00007.
The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the relationship between most comfortable listening level and preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids as a function of variations in speech and noise level.
A digital hearing aid test system was used to simulate six hearing aids having compression ratios of 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, and 10:1. Speech was presented in three different noises (vent, apartment, and cafeteria), with speech input level being varied (55, 70, 85 dB SPL). Subjects were 20 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (half with a dynamic range < or = 30 dB and half with a dynamic range >30 dB). The boundaries of the most comfortable listening range were measured to estimate most comfortable listening level. Preferred listening level was measured by having subjects adjust the output of the hearing aid for satisfactory listening.
On average, the deviation of preferred listening level from most comfortable loudness (MCL) was less than 5 dB. Dynamic range, noise type, and input level were all found to have small, but significant, effects on the deviation of preferred listening level from MCL. On average, subjects with a small dynamic range listened slightly below MCL, and subjects with a larger dynamic range listened slightly above MCL. For favorable signal-to-noise ratios, preferred listening levels were highest for high input levels and for conditions that resulted in high output levels before level adjustment. Although the pattern of average performance differed slightly at poorer signal-to-noise ratios, all preferred listening levels were close to MCL.
The gain of a slow-acting compression hearing aid should place the output within 5 dB of MCL. The output for low and medium inputs should approximate MCL and the output for high input levels should be slightly above MCL. This pattern of gain may be obtained with mild compression ratios and a gain rule that places a speech input of 70 dB at MCL.
本实验旨在确定线性和慢作用压缩式助听器的最舒适聆听水平与偏好聆听水平之间的关系,该关系是语音和噪声水平变化的函数。
使用数字助听器测试系统模拟六款压缩比分别为1、1.5、2、3、5和10:1的助听器。在三种不同噪声(通风口、公寓和自助餐厅)环境下呈现语音,语音输入水平有所变化(55、70、85 dB SPL)。受试者为20名感音神经性听力损失患者(其中一半动态范围≤30 dB,另一半动态范围>30 dB)。测量最舒适聆听范围的边界以估计最舒适聆听水平。通过让受试者调整助听器输出以获得满意聆听效果来测量偏好聆听水平。
平均而言,偏好聆听水平与最舒适响度(MCL)的偏差小于5 dB。发现动态范围、噪声类型和输入水平对偏好聆听水平与MCL的偏差均有微小但显著的影响。平均而言,动态范围小的受试者聆听时略低于MCL,而动态范围大的受试者聆听时略高于MCL。对于有利的信噪比,高输入水平以及在电平调整前导致高输出水平的条件下,偏好聆听水平最高。尽管在较差信噪比下平均表现模式略有不同,但所有偏好聆听水平均接近MCL。
慢作用压缩式助听器的增益应使输出在MCL的5 dB范围内。低输入和中等输入时的输出应接近MCL,高输入水平时的输出应略高于MCL。通过适度的压缩比和将70 dB语音输入置于MCL的增益规则,可能获得这种增益模式。