Suppr超能文献

动力髋螺钉与伽马钉的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Butt M S, Krikler S J, Nafie S, Ali M S

机构信息

Russell's Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.

出版信息

Injury. 1995 Nov;26(9):615-8. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00126-t.

Abstract

We report a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, comparing the results of treatment with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and a gamma nail in 95 consecutive patients with peri-trochanteric fractures of the femur. The DHS was used in 48 patients, the gamma nail in 47. Clinical and radiological outcomes were similar, but the gamma nail was associated with a higher incidence of complications, in particular fracture of the femur below the implant in eight cases. This is consistent with previous reports, and we do not recommend the gamma nail for the treatment of peri-trochanteric femoral fractures.

摘要

我们报告了一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验,比较了动力髋螺钉(DHS)和伽马钉治疗95例连续股骨转子周围骨折患者的结果。48例患者使用了DHS,47例使用了伽马钉。临床和放射学结果相似,但伽马钉的并发症发生率较高,特别是有8例发生了植入物下方的股骨骨折。这与先前的报告一致,我们不建议使用伽马钉治疗股骨转子周围骨折。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验