Butt M S, Krikler S J, Nafie S, Ali M S
Russell's Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.
Injury. 1995 Nov;26(9):615-8. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00126-t.
We report a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, comparing the results of treatment with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and a gamma nail in 95 consecutive patients with peri-trochanteric fractures of the femur. The DHS was used in 48 patients, the gamma nail in 47. Clinical and radiological outcomes were similar, but the gamma nail was associated with a higher incidence of complications, in particular fracture of the femur below the implant in eight cases. This is consistent with previous reports, and we do not recommend the gamma nail for the treatment of peri-trochanteric femoral fractures.
我们报告了一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验,比较了动力髋螺钉(DHS)和伽马钉治疗95例连续股骨转子周围骨折患者的结果。48例患者使用了DHS,47例使用了伽马钉。临床和放射学结果相似,但伽马钉的并发症发生率较高,特别是有8例发生了植入物下方的股骨骨折。这与先前的报告一致,我们不建议使用伽马钉治疗股骨转子周围骨折。